Skip to main content

RIM Takes Another Run at Certicom

RIM Takes Another Run at Certicom

BlackBerry maker Research in Motion spend much of the latter part of 2008 trying to take over encryption developer Certicom—only to have the company seemingly poached out from under them in late January by Verisign. Although Certicom signed a deal to be acquired by Verisign, RIM apparently believes money can talk—it has gone back to Certicom with a new offer that’s nearly twice as rich as the original proposal…and Certicom confirms RIM’s new pitch beats Verisign.

Verisign agreed to acquire Certicom for $2.10 CDN per share; RIM’s new offer is $3.00 CDN per share, totaling roughly $106 million USD. Under the acquisition agreement, Verisign has until February 11 to determine if it wants to beat RIM’s new offer…although Verisign isn’t obligated to put any more money on the table. If Verisign doesn’t up its bid, Certicom will have to decide whether to pay a $4 million CDN termination fee to accept RIM’s offer.

Recommended Videos

And just to add to the tension, RIM’s co-CEO Jim Balsillie will be stepping down from the company’s board along with other executives as part of an agreement to settle allegations of improperly backdating and reprising stock option grants. Under the settlement, Balsillie will pay a penalty of $5 million CDN and is barred from serving on the company’s board for a year; co-CEO Mike Lazaridis will pay a $1.5 million penalty. Both execs also get to pay investigation costs. The agreement also has both co-CEO’s and former CFO Dannis Kavelman repaying some $38.3 million CDN to RIM, along with $30 million CDN to cover costs of an internal probe into option backdating. The allegations held that backdating and re-pricing share options effectively deprived RIM of about $66 million CDN in revenue. The case dates back to 1996.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Motorola might be working on another cheap foldable. Here’s what we know
Someone holding the Motorola Razr 2024, showing its cover screen.

A new Motorola Razr is likely on the way, according to findings from the website 91Mobiles. The new device appeared on the Geekbench platform under the name "Motorola Razr 50s." This phone would most likely be specced below the Razr 50 and the Razr 50 Ultra, which you probably know better as the Razr 2024 and the Razr Plus 2024.

Benchmarking can give us an idea of how powerful a device is without revealing specific specifications, and that's exactly what happened here. On a single-core test, the Motorola Razr 50s scored 1,040 points and 3,003 on a multi-core test.

Read more
This new Android phone could give the Google Pixel 8a a run for its money
Infinix Zero 40 5G.

Here in the United States, we have access to a lot of different phones -- but we're missing out on many of the best bang-for-your-buck budget devices available in other parts of the world. The launch of the Infinix Zero 40 5G is yet another reminder of low- or midrange phones that never see a Western release, especially since it would be a solid competitor to the Google Pixel 8a.

The Infinix Zero 40 5G has a lot going for it, especially considering it costs around $335 to $370 depending on your configuration (versus the current sale price of $399 for the Pixel 8a.) It even has a feature I've never seen in another phone: a GoPro mode. Just look at how travelers can use it to control their cameras.

Read more
The iPhone 16 is giving the iPhone 16 Pro a run for its money
The Camera Control on the iPhone 16.

Apple releases two sets of iPhones every year: the standard and the Pro models. The iPhone 16 series is no different, although its baseline models — the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus — appear to be performing better than expected and giving their Pro siblings some tough competition.

Ming-Chi Kuo, a respected Apple leaker with a steady track record, recently shared preorder statistics for the latest iPhones. The numbers are surprising, including lower demand for the Pro models. Historically, the iPhone Pro models have driven higher numbers. After all, who doesn't want the absolute top-of-the-line option?

Read more