Skip to main content

Many smartphones reportedly exceed FCC limits for radio frequency radiation

There has always been a debate about whether or not exposure to radio frequencies is harmless or not, and that debate will likely be ongoing for some time now. A new report from the Chicago Tribune, however, suggests that we might be subject to a little more radio frequency radiation than previously thought.

The report details a number of tests conducted by researchers and paid for by the Chicago Tribune — and notes that many popular smartphones allegedly emit more radiation than claimed by the companies that make them. Not only that, but many phones exceed safety regulations set in federal guidelines.

Recommended Videos

In the report, the Chicago Tribune details that it bought 11 new smartphones of a number of different brands and tested them to see how much radiation they were giving off. There were four iPhone models and they were sent to an accredited lab for testing radio frequency radiation. Part of the tests included turning the phones to full power and placing them in a liquid that emulates human tissue.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The results? Almost every single phone exceeded limits set by the Federal Communications Commission in some instances. Radiation was most apparent when the phones were as little as 2mm away, which is a distance that’s realistic when a phone is in your pocket. Some manufacturers, like Samsung, reportedly only test phones at distances of 10 to 15mm away from the skin.

The iPhone 7 was the worst of the bunch, and its limit was more than double what Apple reported to federal regulators. The iPhone X was also over in some instances, as was the iPhone 8. Phones from Samsung, Motorola, and Vivo were also tested, and most of them also exceeded limits. Only the Vivo 5 Mini did not exceed limits at some point.

Apple, for its part, claims that the testing was “inaccurate due to the test setup not being in accordance with procedures necessary to properly assess the iPhone models.”

The report also shed some light on the arguably problematic testing phase for phones with the FCC. According to the report, both the FCC and manufacturers test phones before they’re released to the public — however only one device needs to be pass, and manufacturers are allowed to select the testing lab for devices. The FCC sees the importance of the report, too — and has said that it will conduct its own tests in coming months. We’ll have to wait and see what those results turn up.

It’s important to note that the tests were aimed at simulating a worst-case scenario for smartphones. In other words, they likely won’t emit this much radiation in most day-to-day life, unless you’re often on the phone in an area with poor reception. It’s also important to note that the Tribune was quick to point out that even if there is more radiation than previously thought, that doesn’t necessarily mean anything for human health.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
How thin will the iPhone 17 Air be? A new report might have the answer
The Action button on the iPhone 16.

Since the first whispers of the Apple iPhone 17 Air floated across our desks, we've been on the hunt for more information. Just how exactly does the rumored ultra-thin iPhone fit into the company's existing lineup? Recent information suggests it might be a way to test the public reception of a slimmer phone before the launch of Apple's folding phone, and now we have an idea of exactly how thin the iPhone 17 Air is meant to be.

The iPhone 17 Air could be as slim as 5.5mm, according to a new report from Ming-Chi Kuo. Mark Gurman corroborates this theory in his Power On! newsletter, stating that the iPhone 17 Air is a step toward making the chassis as thin as possible. Even if the iPhone 17 Air is in no way related to the rumored foldable, though, it's still going to leave other devices in the dust. Right now, the iPhone 6 holds the record for Apple's thinnest model at 6.9mm, so the iPhone 17 Air will be a major reduction in size.

Read more
The latest iMessage phishing scam is easy to fall for. Here’s how to avoid it
A phishing text in the iMessage.

It’s a new year, but bad actors are still at it with an old trick repackaged for iPhone users. Bleeping Computer reports a rise in phishing attacks targeting iPhone users that involves tricking them into disabling built-in protections and clicking on malicious links.

In an increasing number of cases, text messages appear to come from fake delivery agents posing as service messages from the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). Two Digital Trends contributors have received such sham messages recently in North America.

Read more
Get the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 at up to $1,000 off with this offer
The open Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 is a beast of a phone with a steep price tag, but you can currently get it with an up to $1,000 discount from Samsung through its enhanced trade-in credit program. Trading in even the two-generations-old Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 will get you the maximum value, which would drop the price of the 256GB model of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 from $1,900 all the way down to just $900. You're going to have to be quick though, as there's no telling how much time is remaining in this fantastic promotion from Samsung Galaxy deals.

Why you should buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Samsung's Galaxy Unpacked 2025 will take place on January 22, but if you'd rather have a foldable smartphone over a traditional device like the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S25, you won't regret going for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6. With a rating of 4 stars out of 5 stars in our review and one of the top spots in our list of the best folding phones, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 is a highly recommended purchase. Gone are the days of durability issues, as it features a fantastic design with an improved hinge, an IP48 resistance rating against water and dust, and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 to protect its screen.

Read more