Skip to main content

Is it over? Sprint and T-Mobile may not merge after all

After months of reports suggesting Sprint was working to acquire T-Mobile, any plans for a deal are reportedly now off.
Recommended Videos

People familiar with the situation have told the Wall Street Journal that Sprint and parent company SoftBank decided to ditch its attempt to buy America’s fourth largest wireless carrier because it felt it was unlikely to get the green light from regulators.

Sprint is expected to make an official announcement outlining its position some time on Wednesday.

According to the Journal’s sources, Sprint’s decision to abandon its plans to buy Deutsche Telekom-owned T-Mobile has nothing to do with Iliad’s unexpected $15 billion bid for 56 percent of the company last week. A number of reports suggest that offer has been rejected by T-Mobile, though the two companies are apparently currently in talks to find a way forward.

It’s believed SoftBank was willing to pay as much as $32 billion for T-Mobile in a cash and stock swap deal.

Related: French company Iliad makes $15 billion bid for T-Mobile

For months it was thought that Japan-based SoftBank was looking to merge T-Mobile with Sprint in a deal that would’ve created a U.S.-based carrier with somewhere in the region of 100 million subscribers. This would’ve placed it just behind the country’s two biggest players, AT&T and Verizon, each of which has about 110 million subscribers.

Sprint’s reported decision to end its pursuit of T-Mobile is likely partially caused by the 2011 decision of the US Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice that ended AT&T’s plan to acquire T-Mobile for $39 billion. The regulators concluded that a further reduction in the number of carriers would limit choice for consumers and lead to higher prices.

More recent talks between SoftBank and regulators appear to have persuaded the Sprint owner to finally abandon its plans, believing the regulatory hurdles to be simply too high.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Why the Sprint/T-Mobile merger could actually help the spread of 5G
John-Legere-T-Mobile-CEO

Both Sprint and T-Mobile have made promises about when their customers in the U.S. would start seeing 5G coverage. In spring 2018, when the two telecommunications heavyweights first announced they would be merging, their CEOs wrote a joint “open letter to consumers” promising “5G for all." Almost two years later, with the long-foreshadowed Sprint-T-Mobile merger now legally approved, it looks like it could actually happen, experts say -- but those in underserved non-urban areas may have to keep waiting.

“This merger is very beneficial for T-Mobile, but it’s also beneficial for the U.S., and where we currently are in the global race to 5G,” said Steve Vachon, an analyst at Technology Business Research. “Now, the 5G plan is much more likely to go forward.”

Read more
Report: Judge to rule in favor of Sprint/T-Mobile merger
t mobile revvl news

It looks like the Sprint-T-Mobile merger is about to clear the last of any potential legal hurdles. According to a new report from the New York Times, the judge presiding over the case between the two companies and a coalition of state's attorneys is expected to rule in favor of Sprint and T-Mobile.

The suit was first filed in June by a group of attorney generals from 13 states and the District of Columbia. It first arose after federal regulators, including the Department of Justice, gave the deal the go-ahead. Once the deal goes through, the third and fourth-largest carriers will combine to form the "New T-Mobile." The new company will reportedly have more than 100 million customers.

Read more
The judge in the T-Mobile merger trial isn’t interested in a drawn-out affair
t mobile sprint merger ceo

The trial that ultimately decides whether T-Mobile and Sprint can merge began in a Manhattan federal court Monday, and it's clear that the presiding judge isn't interested in a lengthy affair. U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero asked both sides to skip opening arguments to begin questioning witnesses immediately, and trim their witness lists.

Marrero, who has also presided over high-profile cases including the legality of the Patriot Act and Trump's tax returns, said he didn't want to be "beaten over the head" with testimony, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Read more