Skip to main content

Steve Jobs ordered to answer questions in iTunes-related antitrust case

steve-jobs-close-up-profile-from-behindApple CEO Steve Jobs has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning in an antitrust case which alleges that the tech company iTunes service constitutes a music downloading monopoly. The order comes from U.S. Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd, who is overseeing the proceedings on a complaint that was taken to the courts back in 2005, Bloomberg reports.

The plaintiff’s legal team must abide by a number of court-imposed restrictions; Jobs’ deposition may not exceed two hours and questions must be limited to issues surrounding software changes Apple made in October 2004 that prevented music purchased from RealNetworks, Inc. from working with the iPod MP3 player. The Seattle-based iTunes competitor announced in July 2004 that music purchased from its Harmony online store would work with the popular Apple media players. Five days later, a new iPod software update was revealed with tweaks Apple’s FairPlay — the proprietary software used to encode iTunes content — that would prevent RealNetworks content from working.

Recommended Videos

“The court finds that Jobs has unique, non-repetitive, firsthand knowledge about the issues at the center of the dispute over RealNetworks software,” Lloyd wrote in his order.

The lawsuit started in 2005 when iTunes customer Thomas Slattery filed a complaint following the FairPlay update, claiming that Apple illegally limited the competition by locking iPod users into being iTunes customers as well. The scope of the case was originally much larger, though issues surrounding Apple’s refusal to license FairPlay for third-party use and its decision to use the software to link iTunes with the iPod were dismissed in a 2009 ruling. As a result, Lloyd specifically ordered the plaintiff’s lawyers to keep their questions focused on the 2004 software update and its implications.

Topics
Adam Rosenberg
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Previously, Adam worked in the games press as a freelance writer and critic for a range of outlets, including Digital Trends…
Microsoft patent hints at future return of the Surface Duo
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 comes in Obsidian or Glacier

Is Microsoft secretly working on the return of its Surface Duo folding smartphone? It's possible, as a recently filed patent shows it’s still coming up with ideas for hinges that are the key to making foldables work. The unusual design of the hinge, and the way it’s illustrated in the patent, makes it different than what we expect from Microsoft and foldables in general.

The majority of folding smartphones use a “water drop” style hinge, where the flexible screen forms a water drop shape at the point where it’s folded to improve durability and minimize any crease, but Microsoft’s patent doesn’t seem to include this familiar design. Instead, the hinge appears to use different “sub assembly” sections that slide and flex to facilitate the movement of a flexible screen.

Read more
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim: everything we know so far
A person holding the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, showing the bottom.

Samsung's January Galaxy Unpacked event is just around the corner. We know the event will show off the Galaxy S25 lineup, but there's a chance that it could also unveil the long-rumored Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (and maybe give us a proper name for it besides the rumored title).

We've been following the rumors about this handset for a long time, and we've gathered quite a bit of information about the Galaxy S25 Slim. If you're curious about its specs, potential release window, and everything else we know, read on.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim: possible release date

Read more
4 ways that Google Pixel phones can defeat Samsung in 2025
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL lying by a plant.

When it comes to phones, it would be easy to consider Samsung as the best simply because of its sheer scale. However, look beneath the surface, and you’ll see a bubbling sense of competition. Samsung has failed to innovate and increase its healthy advantage, and the door is open for at least one company to provide a sustained challenge.

Google wants to be that company, and while I think there are better phones in certain categories, Google is the only phone maker that can compete with Samsung at every level. Samsung’s success comes from an ability to spend lavishly to reach its customers, and Google is the only company that can operate at that scale.

Read more