Skip to main content

T-Mobile, Sprint merger delayed: May not happen before September

t mobile asking fcc help order give better coverage home
T-Mobile CEO John Legere Image used with permission by copyright holder
Last we reported on the potential merger between Sprint and T-Mobile, it was reportedly in the final stages, with final details needing to be ironed out. Even if that turns out to be true, a report by Reuters alleges that the merger will not take place before September.

According to “people familiar with the matter,” both companies are currently preparing to present the deal to U.S. regulators, primarily the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Justice (DOJ). Currently, T-Mobile and Sprint are trying to bulletproof their arguments in order to fend off scrutiny from regulators.

Recommended Videos

SoftBank chairman Masayoshi Son argues that the merger between Sprint and T-Mobile would allow both companies the means to properly compete against AT&T and Verizon, the current juggernauts in the U.S. Reuters also notes that SoftBank will likely argue that pending mergers of Comcast and Time Warner Cable, as well as AT&T and DirecTV, will further marginalize Sprint and T-Mobile in that competition will be further shrugged off.

Unfortunately, as has been the case since December of last year, it will be difficult for SoftBank to achieve what it wants. Back in 2011, a merger between AT&T and T-Mobile was rejected, the justification being that the wireless market is too concentrated as it is. For another carrier to go away in a merger would minimize competition.

However, such a thing was done when regulators approved of a merger between US Airways and American Airlines. As such, regulators might be keen to pay attention to the proposal, as it would likely lead to a strong number three.

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
T-Mobile is getting rid of its misleading ‘Price Lock’ policy
T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert standing in front of a banner that reads Internet Freedom.

T-Mobile just got into some trouble with the National Advertising Program (NAD), a part of the BBB National Programs, an independent non-profit organization, for advertising its supposed “Price Lock” policy for 5G internet service.

Basically, the premise behind the “Price Lock” was a promise not to increase prices for customers who were on the Un-Contract Promise: “Starting January 18, 2024, customers activating or switching to an eligible rate plan get our Price Lock guarantee that only you can change what you pay—and we mean it!”

Read more
5 carriers you should use instead of T-Mobile
The T-Mobile logo on a smartphone.

When it comes to performance, quality, and reliability, T-Mobile is undoubtedly one of the best carriers in the U.S. It offers the fastest speeds and the broadest coverage with reasonably priced plans that include quite a few perks.

However, that may still add up to more than you want to pay; top-notch performance comes with a higher price tag attached. The good news is that T-Mobile is far from the only game in town. In addition to the other two of the big three U.S. carriers -- AT&T and Verizon -- there are dozens of Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) that piggyback on the big carrier networks with more affordable plans that offer the same coverage and great performance at a fraction of the price. You’ll get fewer perks, and customer service may not be as responsive, but those may be reasonable tradeoffs for how much you’ll save.

Read more
T-Mobile is buying one of the largest carriers in the U.S.
Cell phone tower shooting off pink beams with a 5G logo next to it.

If you were impacted by T-Mobile's latest price hike and were looking for an alternative carrier, we have some bad news — T-Mobile is buying US Cellular. For those unaware, U.S. Cellular is the fifth-largest carrier in the U.S. despite being a regional carrier based mostly in the Chicago area. Unlike mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) like Metro by T-Mobile or Visible, which piggyback on a parent carrier’s network, US Cellular has its own towers and stores.

The deal would see T-Mobile pay $4.4 billion to take over US Cellular’s wireless customers, stores, and 30% of its spectrum assets. It includes a combination of cash and T-Mobile assuming $2 billion of U.S. Cellular’s debt. US Cellular will keep control of 4,400 of its towers and 70% of its spectrum portfolio, but T-Mobile will extend its leases for 600 US Cellular towers and sign new long-term leases on 2,015 more towers. In a conference call about the deal, T-Mobile also committed to hiring a significant number of U.S. Cellular associates.

Read more