Skip to main content

Digital Self: Google Glass will magnify privacy debates – and that’s a good thing

google glassGoogle Glass has yet to land in the hands of the public – but our outrage over its potential effect on privacy has already begun. Case in point: Seattle’s The 5 Point Cafe, which announced on its Facebook page early last week that anyone wearing Google’s ultra-newfangled mobile contraption is banned from the bar, to protect fellow drinkers’ privacy.

“For the record, The 5 Point is the first Seattle business to ban in advance Google Glasses,” reads the post. “And ass kickings will be encouraged for violators.”

Dave Meinert, owner of The 5 Point, explained to MyNorthwest that his customers deserve to throw back a few dozen Jager Bombs without fear of inadvertently looking like a douchebag in a YouTube video secretly shot by some hypothetical Google Glass user.

“You have to understand the culture of The 5 Point which is a sometimes seedy, maybe notorious place, and I think people want to go there and be not known,” said Meinert. He added: “Part of [the Google Glass ban] is a joke, to be funny on Facebook and get a reaction, but part of it is serious because we don’t let people film other people or take photos unwanted of other people in the bar because it’s kind of a private place people go.”

The thought of a stranger staring at me with a camera on his face induces a special kind of queasiness.

We could bicker all year about the wisdom and efficacy of The 5 Point’s ban on Glass. Staunch privacy advocates like myself will praise the moratorium as a win for personal space. Glass lovers will call skeptics foolish Luddites, and dub Meinert a hypocrite thanks to the security cameras he reportedly has recording his patrons’ every move – not to mention all the camera-packing smartphones everyone at the bar presumably has in their pockets and handbags.

Who’s right about the bar’s Google Glass ban doesn’t really matter – it’s the fact that we’re talking about privacy in a new way that makes the paranoid in me feel all warm and fuzzy.

Fear of the unknown

When Apple launched the smartphone revolution with the original iPhone in 2007, the technology’s effect on privacy remained a niche talking point. Sure, we had a few clairvoyants sounding the alarm. But talk of privacy violations was the last thing on most people’s minds. We were more focused on the niftiness of the App Store than the fact that we now had the equivalent of a house-arrest ankle bracelet in our pockets. For the most part, we still are.

Such is not the case with Google Glass. Following Google co-founder Sergey Brin’s high-flying demonstration of Glass’ array of augmented reality features last summer, commentators immediately pumped out Orwellian warnings about the privacy-free future Glass is sure to impose upon us all. Now businesses are banning the gadget outright, before it even gets a release date. Privacy is not a fringe concern – it is central to discussions about Google Glass.

google glass
Image used with permission by copyright holder

One major reason for these blossoming privacy woes is Google itself, which has built an Internet empire fueled by our personal data. We can rightfully assume that everything we record, photograph, search, or map with Glass will be pushed through the Google pipes. But that’s not all: The new form factor of Glass – glasses loaded with smartphone capabilities – appears to have sparked a concern for personal privacy that didn’t burn smartphones until it was far too late for most people to really care. For some reason, the thought of a stranger staring at me with a camera on his face induces a special kind of queasiness – and I’m clearly not alone.

Go on, be honest

Realistically speaking, Glass likely poses no more threat to our privacy than smartphones, Facebook, credit cards, or CCTV. It’s bad, but not uniquely bad. The design of Glass makes it more conspicuous than Justin Beiber at an all-girls middle school – we’ll know when someone is wearing them. And they even sport that classic little red light, the international sign for “You are being recorded right now, so don’t act like a jackass.” At least you’ll know when your privacy has been violated, which is more than we can say for smartphones.

More than Glass’ relative innocuousness, however, is the fact that we’re preemptively addressing the privacy implications of an emerging technology – which, in turn, stands to ignite a real debate about our sorry, continuous state of observation. The first step to solving our privacy problem is admitting we have one. Google Glass may force us to do just that.

It’s a long-shot, for sure. Once Glass hits stores, most of us will probably just zip past talk of privacy and on to something less stressful – like all the hilarious “fail” videos we just shot of oblivious half-wits with our spanking new pair of Google Glass. But maybe – just maybe – we’ll take this opportunity to revive privacy as a value of 21st century life. And if not, well, meet me at The 5 Point, where we can drink away our fears in peace.

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Galaxy Fold and Google Glass show how our attitudes toward new tech have changed
Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy Fold together, on a table in front of a fan.

The last decade produced two pieces of technology that I absolutely adore, Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy Fold, and although they are both obviously very different, there are some striking similarities between them.

Both show an amazing vision of the future, except only one of them will directly influence products we will actually go out and buy tomorrow.  When we look closely, it reveals how attitudes have changed towards expensive, innovative new tech, along with a willingness to try them out, and an acceptance that flaws can be overcome. This resulted in one of them being pushed ahead, and the other unceremoniously pushed aside. That's a great shame, and here's why.
Desirability, and exclusivity

Read more
My favorite smartphone camera of 2024 isn’t made by Apple or Google
A person holding the Xiaomi 14 Ultra.

When I needed to take photos of a car for a series of stories this month, only one phone came to mind, and it wasn’t one of the top devices made by Google, Samsung, or Apple. It’s the fantastic Xiaomi 14 Ultra, and over the course of a few days, it cemented its place as my favorite camera phone of 2024. Here’s why.
Why is it the best?
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

I already held the Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s camera in high regard after having reviewed the phone and tested it out against other cameras. I especially loved the versatility of the brilliant Photography Kit accessory. But most of this happened earlier on in the year before other brands had the chance to release serious competitors. I knew I had to give it another try, just to be sure of my feelings.

Read more
If you have this Apple Watch charger, stop using it immediately. Here’s why
Belkin Boostcharge Pro.

If you own a Belkin wireless charger for your Apple Watch, it's important to be aware of a recent recall. Belkin is voluntarily recalling its BoostCharge Pro Fast Wireless Charger for Apple Watch + Power Bank 10K due to potential overheating issues that could pose a fire hazard.

This recall affects all units of the Belkin BoostCharge Pro Fast Wireless Charger for Apple Watch + Power Bank 10K, identified by model number BPD005. If you own one of these chargers, you are eligible for a full refund. While no injuries have been reported, Belkin cautions that a manufacturing defect may cause the charger's lithium cell component to overheat.
What you should do if you have the charger
If you happen to own the charger in question, don't panic. Here are a few simple steps you can take to ensure you handle it safely.

Read more