Skip to main content

The Samsung Galaxy Ring may change wearables forever

The gold Samsung Galaxy Ring.
The Samsung Galaxy Ring Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Samsung had the opportunity to change its strategy with the Galaxy Ring and introduce a subscription model for its app, something it has discussed doing in the past. For now, though, it has chosen to keep access and data free, just like it is with the Galaxy Watch range.

This is a far bigger deal than you may initially think, and it has the potential to change the way health and fitness brands view subscription models in the future.

Recommended Videos

Subscription fever

The RingConn Smart Ring and Oura Ring.
The RingConn Smart Ring (left) and Oura Ring Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Samsung Galaxy Ring uses the Samsung Health app to communicate with your phone, and the company has made it very clear that it will be free to use and that no subscription will be required to unlock features or data. This is different from Oura’s strategy with the Oura Ring, where it charges $6 per month to access the data. If you don’t pay, functionality is reduced to viewing three basic numbers: your Sleep Score, Readiness, and Activity.

While it’s not the only smart ring alternative to the Galaxy Ring, the Oura Ring is by far the best alternative. While the RingConn Smart Ring is a decent runner-up, the app doesn’t provide the same level of data insight or complexity as the Oura Ring, but it is entirely free to use after you’ve paid for the ring itself. Circular, makers of the Ring Slim, isn’t forthcoming about whether a subscription fee will be introduced for its app and features or not, and such indecision, along with the shortcomings of the product, make it a poor choice.

What if you choose a smartwatch instead? Like Samsung, Apple does not charge a subscription to its health and fitness apps for the Apple Watch, but Google encourages you to pay $10 per month for Fitbit Premium’s in-depth data and a few additional features. This applies to the Google Pixel Watch 2, the Fitbit Charge 6, and most other Fitbit wearables. At almost every turn outside of Apple and Samsung, the potential to pay monthly to see your health and fitness data is usually there.

Samsung had no choice

A person wearing the Samsung Galaxy Ring and the Oura Ring.
The Oura Ring (left) and Samsung Galaxy Ring Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Samsung isn’t being charitable, as it was faced with little choice but to make the Galaxy Ring free to use after purchase. It can’t risk being forgotten if (when?) Apple releases a smart ring, as Apple has never hinted at a subscription model for its health platform. Plus, it must compete with the Oura Ring — the most successful and currently best-known smart ring — immediately. Charging for data access would be a significant barrier against wider adoption of its first smart ring.

What’s more, it has made the wise decision to introduce a range of new features instead of either leaving the app untouched or, worse, stripping back functionality. The Galaxy Ring has an Energy Score rating that takes your activity, sleep, and heart rate data and packages it into a single figure to show daily condition. Galaxy AI powers the other new feature, called Wellness Tips, which can be tailored to help you manage weight, increase your fitness, or sleep better.

Conversely, you need Fitbit Premium to unlock a daily readiness score, and you need to pay Oura’s subscription to get details about its Readiness Score, otherwise all you see is the figure itself. Fitbit’s Wellness Report, where you get insights into how your condition is affecting your body, is also a Premium feature.

The Galaxy Ring is expensive to purchase at $399, but you aren’t missing out on features, and you don’t have to budget for ownership over time either. It’s immediately obvious that it’s a good value, and that realization quickly offsets the higher initial price.

The competition should be worried

A person wearing the Google Pixel Watch 2.
The Google Pixel Watch 2 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Alarm bells should now be ringing through Oura’s and Fitbit’s offices. I’ve tried the Samsung Galaxy Ring on and the hardware is excellent, plus the overall presentation is more attractive and desirable than that of the Oura Ring. It’s also vastly more convenient to wear a smart ring than it is to wear a smartwatch or a fitness band, especially if you’re not a hardcore sports fanatic. Now add in a completely free app experience, which includes features that cost extra to access on other devices, plus a globally recognized and admired brand name, and the Samsung Galaxy Ring should have other brands quaking in their boots.

Oura has been better at adding features to its app over the past year, but the fact remains that it costs money to use the ring over time. There’s a cheaper option for the hardware, which can negate some of the extra cost compared to the Galaxy Ring for the first year, but the Samsung smart ring looks and feels more modern, plus it’s lighter, too. A Fitbit product will track more workouts, and you don’t have to pay for Premium, but none of the devices are anywhere near as stylish as the Galaxy Ring. If all you do is walk, cycle, or run at a casual level, a Fitbit may be overkill anyway.

What’s more, if your lifestyle or fitness goals change or the Galaxy Ring doesn’t exactly fit with your evolving needs, the Galaxy Watch range does everything else you could want from a fitness-tracking, app, and notification standpoint. Plus, if you choose the latest Galaxy Watch 7, it’ll work nicely with the Galaxy Ring and extend its battery life. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, does anyone really want to add another subscription to what is likely an already-too-long list if presented with a choice?

Subscriptions could change — or even disappear

The Samsung Galaxy Ring next to its charging case.
Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

No, of course no one wants to pay for a subscription. Until now, the Oura Ring was really the only sensible smart ring purchase, and paying monthly for it was the only option if you wanted to own one. While I’m not going to relegate the Oura Ring to second best until I’ve tried the Galaxy Ring for a few weeks, Oura really needs to examine an alternative to its subscription-only model.

Whether it ups the cost of the hardware or goes down the Fitbit Premium route of providing most features for free, it doesn’t matter. It has to counter the attack from Samsung at a price level if it wants to protect its future, and the same goes for Circular and its terrible messaging around subscription costs in the future. Fitbit is unlikely to change and doesn’t have a smart ring of its own yet, which brings us to how Samsung may affect this still-new product type in the future.

The Galaxy Ring may very well bring more smart rings from other brands to market as the general public starts to see the benefits of such a device, and its commitment to a free app and health data should make the companies responsible for them seriously consider doing the same. Samsung has done the right thing with the Galaxy Ring and Samsung Health.

It’s good news for us today and potentially in the future, too, but it’s bad news for those capitalizing on subscription models today unless they change their ways.

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
The Galaxy Z Flip 7’s biggest change may be hidden inside the phone
A person putting the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 in their pocket.

Significant changes may be on the horizon for Samsung’s upcoming foldable handsets next year. Once again, we’re hearing that the company intends to use in-house chips for two foldable devices set to launch in 2025. If this is accurate, it would be groundbreaking news.

Since their initial model launches, Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold and Galaxy Z Flip have included Qualcomm chips. For example, the current Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Galaxy Z Flip 6 have a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. If Samsung stuck with tradition, the 2025 Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7 would include a Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset — the chip we expect to see in Samsung’s Galaxy S25 lineup, which should be announced in the coming weeks.

Read more
The Samsung Galaxy S25 release date may have leaked
The back of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra in Titanium Orange.

The next major smartphone release is approaching quickly. According to tipster Abhishek Yadav (via SamMobile), Samsung is set to launch its Galaxy S25 series on Wednesday, January 22, 2025. While earlier rumors suggested that the actual date might be January 23, it’s clear that the arrival of the Galaxy S25, Galaxy S25 Plus, and Galaxy S25 Ultra is imminent.

It is not yet known whether January 22 is the date when Samsung will announce the new phones at an Unpacked event or if it is the official launch date. Earlier this year, the company announced the Galaxy S24 series on January 17, with a release date set for January 31.

Read more
Bad news, Samsung fans. The Galaxy S25 series might get a price increase
The purple Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus resting against a white pole.

The Samsung Galaxy S25's rumored launch date is just over a month away, but leaks still pour in seemingly every day. Unfortunately, the latest bears bad news: a potential price hike. The Galaxy S25 price may rise by roughly 150,000 won (around $105 USD), according to The JoongAng newspaper. The South Korean Won (KRW) has weakened compared to the USD (and currently sits at around 1,432 won to 1 USD), which means higher costs for importing components, according to Yonhap News, a South Korean news site.

The average price of Samsung devices is lower in foreign markets compared to Korea, but a major change in the home market pricing will spill over into foreign pricing, too. The recent political turmoil in South Korea, paired with increased exchange rates, is apparently driving the potential increase. The Samsung Galaxy S24 launched at $800 for the base model. The potential price increase means the Galaxy S25 could start at $900 or higher. Following that trend, we could see a starting price of $1,000 for the Galaxy S25 Plus and $1,400 for the Galaxy S25 Ultra. The S24 Ultra was already $100 more expensive than the previous generation.

Read more