Skip to main content

Alien 3 is the most underrated movie in the Alien franchise. Deal with it.

An alien xenomorph really needs a breathment in a scene from Alien 3.
20th Century Studios

This week, the Alien franchise is continuing for the first time in seven years with Alien: Romulus. Ridley Scott’s original Alien came out 45 years ago in 1979, and many have argued that the franchise peaked there. Others believe that James Cameron’s Aliens, the first sequel, is the real masterpiece among these movies. But it’s kind of all downhill from there … aside from Alien 3. That film was also the directorial debut of David Fincher, the man behind Fight Club and The Social Network.

Now, Alien 3 is not without its problems. And the film does make some dramatic missteps, including the off-screen death of Newt, the young girl whom Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) loved like a daughter. Even Fincher himself disowned Alien 3 in 2009. Yet compared to everything that came after it, including Scott’s Prometheus and Alien: Covenant, Alien 3 looks a lot better 32 years later. That’s why we’re going to share the four reasons why Alien 3 is the most underrated movie in the Alien franchise.

Recommended Videos

It makes the Xenomorphs frightening again

An alien xenomorph from Alien 3.
20th Century Studios

Cameron hit upon the way to outdo Alien by introducing dozens, if not hundreds, of alien Xenomorphs in Aliens. However, seeing that many Xenomorphs at once, and so often, made them less frightening than they were before. For a variety of reasons, Fincher’s Alien 3 had to scale back on the threat to a single Xenomorph. That could have been a disaster, and yet it amped up the tension with the most inhuman-like Xenomorph to that point. The alien in question hatched from a dog’s body, and it took on canine characteristics rather than human traits.

Setting the film in a space colony prison also did a lot for the film. The claustrophobic atmosphere amplified the threat of the Xenomorph, especially since the prisoners didn’t have weapons that could make much of a difference in a fight to the death.

Alien 3 has a great cast

Ripley and a group of men stand in Alien 3.
20th Century Fox

It should go without saying that Sigourney Weaver turned in a terrific performance as Ripley, but she still deserves to be acknowledged for that. The rest is also pretty great, including Game of Thrones‘ Charles Dance as Jonathan Clemens, a prison doctor who bonds with Ripley. Similarly, Charles S. Dutton has a powerful turn as Leonard Dillon, the leader of the prisoners who is also their spiritual guide.

Even Paul McGann, a few years before his leading role in the 1996 Doctor Who TV movie, has a memorable role as Walter Golic, a psychopath who survives his initial encounter with the Xenomorph. Lance Henriksen also briefly returns from Aliens as the android Bishop and as another character whose identity we won’t spoil. In his very small amount of screen time, Henriksen gives Bishop more humanity than you might expect. Unlike the late Newt and Hicks from Aliens, Bishop gets a proper farewell.

It’s a visually stunning film

The exterior of the planet in Alien 3.
20th Century Studios

Say what you will about Fincher’s direction and the creative choices forced upon him by the studio. The one thing few could find fault with are the film’s visuals. Alien 3 is a great-looking movie. The $50-million-to-$60-million budget was considerably higher than Aliens‘ $18 million, but that money was put to good use. Fincher’s music video experience may have also helped him give the film its unique look.

The special effects for the Xenomorph itself are also very impressive. There’s a reason why Alien 3‘s most famous scene — a close-up encounter between the Xenomorph and Ripley — remains popular. The creature has rarely seemed more real than when it was inches away from Ripley’s face. Even the tight camera angle works to make that moment stand out on screen. Fincher may not like talking about this movie, but he deserves the credit for making it shine.

It gives Ripley a poetic ending

Sigourney Weaver's Ripley decides her fate in Alien 3.
20th Century Studios

Sigourney Weaver wasn’t quite done with the franchise after this, as she returned for Alien: Resurrection. But Alien 3 is the true conclusion of Ripley’s arc that began with Alien and continued with Aliens. Ripley has always been the survivor, but she also loses something each time. Between the first and second films, Ripley lost decades of time with her young daughter, who had become elderly in the interim. And in the third film, Ripley loses Newt, who was the closest thing to a child she had left.

We won’t spoil some of the twists in Alien 3. Suffice to say that Ripley has a choice about her own survival, and the fate of humanity… and she makes it. Ripley may not have had a happy life, but she chooses her own fate and gets an epic end that’s worthy of her character.

Watch Alien 3 on Hulu.

Topics
Blair Marnell
Blair Marnell has been an entertainment journalist for over 15 years. His bylines have appeared in Wizard Magazine, Geek…
Forget Khan! This Star Trek movie is perhaps the most important one in the franchise’s history
Kirk and crew in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

Among the Star Trek faithful, and even casual movie fans, it's well known that the even-numbered Star Trek movies -- II, IV, VI, and VIII (First Contact) -- are the "good" ones, the one exception being X, Nemesis, which (some would say, mercifully) ended big screen Trek until JJ Abrams' 2009 "Kelvin" timeline reboot.

But there's another exception among the odd-numbered "bad" Trek films that's a bit underrated, and that's Star Trek III: The Search for Spock. While not as inspired as The Wrath of Khan, The Voyage Home, or (my favorite) The Undiscovered Country, the movie still holds up pretty well in terms of story and visual effects. It also remains one of the most emotional and important Trek stories, a fan love-in for characters (and actors) who were already aging 40 years ago when the film premiered in the summer of 1984.
Star Trek III leans heavily on Wrath of Khan (that's a good thing)
The USS Grissom visits Genesis in Star Trek III Paramount

Read more
Terrifier 3 director teases the end of the horror franchise
Art the Clown holds an axe while wearing a Santa costume in Terrifier 3.

Art the Clown may seem unstoppable, but that doesn't mean the Terrifier franchise is going to continue forever. The horror series' creator, writer-director Damien Leone, has confirmed as much.

"My big fear is of going on too long and wearing out my welcome," the filmmaker confessed in an interview with SFX Magazine. "I want to have a solid franchise, whether it be a trilogy – or maybe a quadrilogy if I have one more in mind – where it starts, where it ends, and you can walk away with a satisfying conclusion and closure and say that was pretty cool."

Read more
25 years later, one of Hollywood’s biggest bombs remains one of its most underrated movies
Antonio Banderas and Maria Bonnevie as Ahman ibn Fadlan and Olga smiling while sitting on the grass in The 13th Warrior.

On the weekend of August 31, 1999, a little movie that took the world by surprise kept its place atop the box office. The film, M. Night Shyamalan's The Sixth Sense, premiered at the beginning of the month and would eventually gross over $600 million worldwide, rendering most of its competition moot. It was in this unexpectedly competitive climate that John McTiernan's historical epic The 13th Warrior came out, and the results couldn't have been more different than Shyamalan's little movie that could.

By now, The 13th Warrior's story is well-known. A trainwreck in pretty much every conceivable metric, the film was widely panned by contemporary critics and grossed only $61 million worldwide against a production budget of $160 million. The 13th Warrior was one of the year's most notorious flops, but how does it hold up in 2024? It might not be fair to call The 13th Warrior a masterpiece, but it's equally unjust to deem it one of the decade's worst. The truth is somewhere in the middle because, for all its flaws, there's genuine value in The 13th Warrior, making it a surprisingly underrated gem from the '90s.
Between 'historical' and 'fiction'

Read more