Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Roland Emmerich on science, streaming, and Moonfall’s origin

Director and screenwriter Roland Emmerich has pitted the protagonists of his films against all manner of cataclysmic threats, from aliens and rampaging kaiju to superstorms and apocalyptic Mayan prophesies, but his latest cinematic thriller adds another source of potential disaster to the list: The moon.

In Moonfall, a mysterious event knocks the moon out of its orbit, sending it on a new path that has it colliding with Earth. The planet soon finds its fate resting in the hands of a pair of former astronauts (Halle Berry and Patrick Wilson) and a brilliant conspiracy theorist (John Bradley) who must journey to the lunar surface — and possibly beyond — to discover why the moon changed course and what secrets it holds. As they do so, those left behind on Earth must contend with the environmental impacts of the moon’s changing orbit, including fluctuating gravity, tidal waves, and other catastrophic events.

Recommended Videos

Emmerich, who directed, co-wrote, and co-produced Moonfall, spoke with Digital Trends about the origins of the film’s wild lunar conspiracy premise, the process of bringing its spectacular sci-fi and disaster sequences to the screen, and his thoughts on the tug-of-war between theatrical and streaming release strategies that continues to unfold in Hollywood.

Roland Emmerich stands on the set of the film Moonfall.
Lionsgate

Digital Trends: Moonfall has such a wild, fascinating concept for a film. Can you give me a brief overview of where the idea came from and how you refined it to get to the point where you were ready to make a movie out of it?

Roland Emmerich: I read a book maybe 9 or 10 years ago that had this provocative title, Who Built The Moon? That actually started everything, and I said to myself” “If the Moon is falling to Earth, it has to have a reason.” And that led to the idea of a nanoswarm that whirls toward the moon and then sort of drills itself into the moon’s surface. But it all started with that book. The idea came to mind a while ago, but it took quite some time to actually figure out how to do it.

There were a lot of scientists and NASA researchers consulted on various elements of the film. How did their input shape Moonfall?

Our visual effects supervisor, Peter Travers, told us a couple of things which weren’t going to work in the script. So from there, we went and looked for some opinions about how to make certain things work. It was a slow but sure process. When we were shooting, for example, we had an astronaut with us when we did all the shuttle scenes.

That certainly helps.

Yeah, that definitely helped, because nobody knew what buttons to push in the shuttle! So there were a lot of scientists involved. You always need that to kind of ground things in reality, because the idea is so crazy.

Patrick Wilson floats through space in an astronaut suit in a scene from Moonfall.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While watching the film, I was struck by how difficult it’s becoming to create escapist disaster films. Climate change and other potential threats feel a little too real these days, but a mysterious enemy sending the moon out of orbit is so crazy it works. Do you find yourself having to go further out there for disaster premises that are entertaining rather than depressing? 

Well, first, Moonfall is meant as escapist adventure, yes. The Earth is in danger, but the story is really about the adventure of flying to the moon, going inside the moon, and experiencing everything inside. So it’s an adventure film more than a disaster film, I think, because the disaster is secondary. […] But it is a little hard these days to do movies like this — especially without an established IP or franchise. That’s really, really hard.

So many of your films involve epic visual-effects shots. What’s your process like in working with the VFX team? How much of the scenes do you typically have mapped out and envisioned — whether through the previsualization process or concept art — when you begin production?

I have to pre-vis all the visual effects scenes. That’s a given with me: That I’ll work with the VFX guys for four or five months and create all the visual effects scenes. You’ll need them later for cutting them in anyways, so that’s the only way to do these films. Of course, some of it will probably get cut at some point, because you end up shortening it and doing your thing, and it will still be a race against time at the end. There’s always a quality level you want to reach, though. That’s always the hardest part of it. There are usually 10, 20, or 30 shots which just don’t want to work in the end, no matter how much time you could spend on them. It’s tough.

You also occasionally have believability problems you need to work out [with visual effects] that come up later on. For example, for a big jump scene they have to do in the film, we had to add a dust cloud coming towards the characters, and it was a relatively late addition. So [the VFX team] had to undo the shot, basically, and then put the dust cloud in and then finish it off again. It’s never easy to make things like that look real.

A shuttle floats through space with the moon in the background in a scene from Moonfall.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Without spoiling too much, is there a particular scene you’re really excited for audiences to see in Moonfall

I really like when they go inside the moon. It’s probably the most exciting sequence for me. When they’re flying into the moon and have no idea what to expect, that was so exciting for me.

Again, without spoiling anything, is there a particular element of the film that changed a lot as you went along, and ended up a lot different than how you initially planned it?

We ended up putting more things inside the moon than we planned, in order to give it more dimensions and let you see more of the depth inside it. We also realized pretty early on that we had to put the light source inside the moon not totally in the middle, but a little bit more like a backlight, because it looked so much better that way and the shadows didn’t cause as many problems. There were lots of little things like that we changed along the way.

John Bradley, from left, Halle Berry, and Patrick Wilson have a discussion in Moonfall.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Moonfall is heading to theaters at a time when there’s a lot of debate around streaming and theatrical releases, and a pandemic reshaping the traditional distribution model. Where do you see things headed with respect to all of those elements?

I’m just really curious about how many people will go and see this film in the end, because I really have no idea what to expect. We have tracking numbers and everything as always, but the tracking numbers don’t tell the full story anymore.

The studio, Lionsgate, asked me not to write an advance review of the film because I didn’t see it in a theater, even though I enjoyed it at home. Home theater technology has come a long way in recent years, and you can get a theater-level experience at home now, so what do you think a film like this still loses when you don’t see it in a theater?

I would say it’s more the sound than the picture, because you can see something on a big screen that’s like 60 or 70 inches in diameter, and if you sit really close, you can have a very theatrical feeling in your living room. But the sound is not as good [outside of a theater]. You need a bigger room to have that sound quality. We have things like Dolby Atmos now [in theaters], and you really feel everything around you in the sound, and that gets lost at home.

Roland Emmerich’s Moonfall premieres February 4 in theaters.

Topics
Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Like Clint Eastwood’s thriller Juror #2? Then watch these three movies now
A mann stands up behind a chair and looks in Juror #2.

There is nobody like Clint Eastwood. The 94-year-old legend is still working, and his latest film, Juror #2, might be his best in 15 years. The Order's Nicholas Hoult stars as Justin Kemp, a Georgia resident called for jury duty on a high-profile murder case. Kemp holds a dark secret: he may have unknowingly played a hand in the murder. Kemp's moral dilemma eats at him, as it could influence the decision of the trial.

The release rollout from Warner Bros. for Juror #2 has been extremely baffling. Juror #2 was originally supposed to hit streaming. However, the studio gave the movie a limited theatrical release with no plans to expand nationwide. Now, Juror #2 is finally streaming on Max, so do yourself a favor and watch it. Afterward, keep the courtroom theme going and watch one of these three excellent movies.
The Verdict (1982)

Read more
Disney co-chairman reveals why The Acolyte was canceled after one season
Sol wields his lightsaber in The Acolyte episode 8.

Lucasfilm may be in the midst of experiencing a wave of positive attention and success thanks to its latest TV series, Skeleton Crew, but the Jude Law-starring sci-fi show isn't the only Star Wars title that has premiered on Disney+ this year. This past summer, Lucasfilm also debuted The Acolyte, a Sith-centric show set around 100 years before the events of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace. Across its eight episodes, the series proved to be critically divisive, and it was only a month after The Acolyte's finale aired that Disney and Lucasfilm announced they would not be bringing the show back for a second season.

In a recent interview with Vulture, Disney Entertainment co-chairman Alan Bergman shed some light on the behind-the-scenes decision to cancel The Acolyte after just one season. "As it relates to Acolyte, we were happy with our performance, but it wasn’t where we needed it to be given the cost structure of that title, quite frankly, to go and make a season 2," Bergman revealed. "That’s the reason why we didn’t do that."

Read more
James Gunn calls Creature Commandos episode the saddest thing he’s ever written
james gunn calls creature commandos weasel episode saddest thing ever written sits at the bottom of a staircase in

Creature Commandos has been splitting its time as of late between the past and present. Its recent episodes have both propelled the show's present-day plot forward and also explored the pasts of characters like The Bride (Indira Varma) and G.I. Robot (Sean Gunn), offering new insights into the tragic events that shaped their identities and led them to their current circumstances. Creature Commandos' fourth and most recent episode, Chasing Squirrels, does the same for Weasel (also Sean Gunn), revealing the horrifying reasons the character was incorrectly blamed for the deaths of multiple schoolchildren.

The episode refrains from explaining what Weasel is or how the character came to be, but it doesn't shy away from the gruesome and tragic details of the "crime" that turned him into a full-blown monster in society's eyes. In an interview with Variety, Creature Commandos creator and DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn reflected on the episode, which is emotionally and narratively dark, even by the Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 filmmaker's standards.

Read more