Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

20 years ago, one of the most unsettling movies ever made divided audiences

Two people float in the ocean in Open Water.
Lions Gate

There were two movie posters widely used for Open Water, the low-budget survival thriller that swam into theaters 20 years ago today. The more sensational of the two featured the film’s stars, Blanchard Ryan and Daniel Travis, bobbing in the water near the background of the frame. In the foreground — overshadowing them, nearly blotting out the whole image — is a large dorsal fin. This is what you could call the standard protocol for selling a movie about aquatic maneaters. When not simply ripping off the iconic open maw of the Jaws poster, the offspring of that seminal blockbuster use the ominous triangle on the beast’s back as design bait. It’s the visual equivalent of shouting “Shark!”

The other poster for Open Water is more suggestive — and, consequently, much closer in spirit to the film it advertises. There are no sharks visible in this artwork. Instead, the image pulls further out from the couple into a stark wide shot, emphasizing the vast, unforgiving sprawl of the ocean around them. Surrounded by water, puny under a canopy of storm clouds, the two look truly alone. And much more than the predators circling below the waves, it’s that sense of helpless isolation that gives this stripped-to-the-bone Jaws descendant its bite.

The poster for Open Water.
Lions Gate

What Open Water has that many other shark movies don’t is a chill of plausibility. It’s an unsettlingly believable nightmare that plunks you down in the drink with its characters. That the film is based on a true story only tightens the clench of its realism. In 1998, a couple was accidentally left behind during a diving trip to the Great Barrier Reef; this historic screwup and the subsequent search reshaped safety protocols in the Queensland scuba industry. Open Water changes the names and the location — it’s set in the Caribbean, not Australia — but stays true to the events that inspired it, while credibly speculating on what may have happened out there after the boat pulled away without two of its passengers.

The opening scenes introduce us to Susan (Ryan) and Daniel (Travis), workaholic young professionals taking a much-needed, hastily planned tropical vacation. Writer-director Chris Kentis identifies stress lines in their twentysomething bliss, like Daniel’s failed attempts to put Susan in the mood the night before their ill-fated scuba excursion. These moments lay a bedrock of conflict — or, rather, conflict avoidance — that the movie will exploit once the two are stranded at sea. Looked at one way, Open Water is a drama about a relationship that’s been coasting for a while and the moment that it hits some very choppy waters. 

A man and a woman argue in Open Water.
Lions Gate

How the two get abandoned is all too convincing. It hinges on another diver’s gear screwup, a simple head count mistake, and Daniel’s insistence that they do their own thing and break away a little from the group. Maybe 20 minutes into the movie, the two emerge from the depths to find that the boat (and land) is nowhere in sight. They’ve been left behind. And as the hours tick by, their illusion that everything will be OK— that they’re merely experiencing an epic inconvenience — slowly deflates.

Shot for as little as $120,000 and screened to raves at the Sundance Film Festival, Open Water is essentially the Blair Witch Project of fin flicks. Kentis, who identifies as a scuba enthusiast in real life, doesn’t adopt a found-footage framework or anything. But he does shoot the film on unglamorous, early-2000s digital video that enhances its sense of docurealism — that scraggly vérité quality that can erase the invisible distance between an audience and the events they’re watching. There’s certainly something distinctly Blair Witch about ordinary people lost in the middle of nowhere, bickering and panicking and trying to keep their wits about them as the sobering reality of their circumstances sets in.

Blanchard Ryan and Daniel Travis huddle close in their wetsuits in a still from the movie Open Water.
Blanchard Ryan and Daniel Travis in Open Water Lionsgate / Lionsgate

Most of the movie is a two-hander. It could arguably work on the stage, provided that stage was a swimming pool. Besides the occasional (and arguably unnecessary) cutaway shot to dry land, we’re just out in the ocean with these two characters, floating without recourse as their patience wanes, their appetites grow, and sunlight fades. There’s a fair amount of dry humor in their reactions: “I wanted to go skiing!” Susan snaps during a late spat. As an acting exercise, Open Water is deceptively ambitious. The movie’s fear factor rests on how Ryan and Travis navigate the emotional shifts of this worst-case scenario.

The film’s arc is two level-headed people realizing, over the course of a day, just how monumentally screwed they are. Like terminal patients experiencing the stages of grief, they cling to the buoy of denial, convincing themselves that the boat will be back any minute, that this is just a story they’ll get to tell their friends later. Early on, they drop their leg weights, joking that the company wouldn’t dare try to charge them for them, as if that were the biggest thing they ultimately have to worry about. Their irritation eventually cracks into anger and then into fear. They’ve put their trust in fail-safes and guardrails that don’t exist.

A man and a woman look at something in the water in Open Water.
Lions Gate

As for the star attractions, they’re on the periphery, until they aren’t. In another play for realism, Kentis used actual sharks instead of animatronics or CGI. They are not the hulking leviathans we’ve come to expect in the aftermath of Jaws. They look and behave like real animals, splashing around erratically, their attacks arriving without warning or dun-dun foreshadowing. There’s one spectacularly creepy money shot late in the film asthe camera dips below the frame line of the water to catch a quick glimpse of a whole school of them darting around their easy targets. It’s a great metaphor for how Susan and Dan process the danger of their situation — the awful truth lurking just out of sight.

But if you went into Open Water expecting a full-blown creature feature, you might leave gnashing your own teeth. The sharks are a borderline abstract threat, a monster rarely seen. Jaws, long celebrated for keeping the big guy out of sight for long stretches (a genius solution to a malfunctioning special effect), is much heavier on shark action. Much gorier, too. As a result, Open Water proved about as divisive as Blair Witch, earning mostly positive reviews while royally ticking off those not keen to watch a couple of unknown actors float and argue for 80 minutes. (At the Chainsaw Awards, Fangoria Magazine’s annual reader poll, Open Water was nominated for best and worst horror movie of the year.)

Open Water 2003 Trailer | Blanchard Ryan | Daniel Travis

Still, the film pushes beyond mere galeophobia. At its best, it gets you pondering what you would do in the fins of the characters. Or what you even could do. It’s rare to see a thriller built on existential helplessness. Susan and Daniel are almost literal sitting ducks, so vulnerable that they can’t even plant their feet. You could say that the film preys on a primordial fear of the water, but there’s another fear lurking deeper still, like those dead-eyed eating machines. Open Water says that the world is not as safety-proofed as you thought. The worst can happen, sometimes it will, and there’s no guarantee that anyone will come to save you. That’s a hell of a lot scarier than a fish of any size or appetite.

Open Water is currently streaming on Max. For more of A.A. Dowd’s writing, visit his Authory page.

Topics
A.A. Dowd
A.A. Dowd, or Alex to his friends, is a writer and editor based in Chicago. He has held staff positions at The A.V. Club and…
20 years ago, Tom Cruise gave his best performance ever in this great action thriller
Tom Cruise holds and points a gun.

Tom Cruise is Hollywood's last movie star. Unlike most of his contemporaries, Cruise still champions the theatrical release, headlining movies designed to be seen on the big screen. Even Cruise's contemporaries, like Leonardo DiCaprio, Denzel Washington, and Tom Hanks, have embraced streaming. The same can't be said for Cruise, who famously delayed Top Gun: Maverick due to the COVID pandemic to keep its theatrical release, a risk that paid off to the tune of nearly $1.5 billion worldwide.

Throughout the 21st century, Cruise's talent has never wavered. He's a four-time Academy Award nominee with a steadfast commitment to his craft that remains unmatched. Yet, Cruise has played within the action-hero sandbox for the last 15 years, rarely stepping outside to work in other genres. As great as Cruise has been playing Ethan Hunt in the Mission: Impossible films and Pete Mitchell in Top Gun: Maverick, his memorable turn as the villain in Michael Mann's Collateral, which celebrates its 20th anniversary on August 6, is his best performance of the 21st century.
Tom Cruise thrives as a villain
COLLATERAL Clip - "First Kill" (2004) Tom Cruise

Read more
Trap is the most divisive movie of 2024 so far. Is it any good?
A man looks angry in Trap.

Few directors have had more divisive careers than M. Night Shyamalan. After bursting onto the scene with a movie that everyone sees as a classic (even though it is not his first film), Shyamalan showed immense promise, but many thought that promise went largely unrealized.

Thankfully, Shyamalan didn't give up after his failures, and now he's back with Trap, a movie that has proven just as divisive as Shyamalan's career as a whole. The movie, which follows a serial killer who has discovered that he's fallen into a trap laid for him by authorities, has earned praise and critiques in almost equal measure. Here are four reasons you should definitely check it out.
M. Night Shyamalan remains a master stylist
Trap | Official Trailer 2

Read more
20 years later, this widely hated blockbuster is still one of Hollywood’s most underrated thrillers
A group of people eat at a dinner table in The Village.

There’s a new M. Night Shyamalan movie opening this coming weekend, but you’ll have to wait a couple more days to hear how it is. Trap, starring Josh Hartnett as … well, let’s say less than the trailer does, is not screening at all for the press in advance of its release on Friday. Shyamalan still divides critics. The reviews for his 2021 film Old, for example, were rather evenly, ahem, split between positive and negative. So it’s possible the studio is trying to delay the inevitable pans. On the other hand, maybe it's just closely guarding the secrets of Trap. This is a Shyamalan movie, after all. There are bound to be some major surprises.

It’s never been fair to reduce this Hollywood hitmaker’s body of work to a mere collection of plot twists. Going back to The Sixth Sense, the unusually melancholic 1999 sleeper phenomenon that made his career, Shyamalan’s films tend to be more than the sum of their 11th-hour revelations. Still, it’s no great mystery why everyone became fixated on the rug pulls above all else. The writer-director trained audiences to expect them! For a while there, every new thriller he made seemed to be straining to replicate the mind-blowing power of The Sixth Sense’s final minutes — to leave the audience buzzing and reeling and talking on the way out of the theater. Twists were his brand, even if his movies didn’t live or die on them.

Read more