Skip to main content

25 years ago, the angriest war movie ever made was released

Spike Jonze in Three Kings.
Warner Bros.

The year 1999 was, quite famously, a good one for movies. Even the best blockbusters felt political, and more importantly, their themes and ideas felt particularly urgent. Three Kings was one such movie that was beloved at the time, and its stature has only grown in the years since it was first released.

The film, which stars George Clooney, Mark Wahlberg, and Ice Cube, follows four soldiers at the conclusion of the Gulf War who decide to attempt a heist before leaving the Middle East for good. Directed by David O. Russell, the movie is an angry political war cry, but one that mixes comedy, action, and sincere drama to great effect. Here are five reasons you should make time for it.

Recommended Videos

The movie is a metaphor for the entire Gulf War

Three Kings 1999 Trailer | George Clooney | Mark Wahlberg | Ice Cube

This story, which follows a group of soldiers who decide to rob Saddam Hussein’s gold reserves and ultimately get roped into helping the local population fend off a group of raiders, is fairly easy to read as the story of the Gulf War in miniature. The way many see it, the U.S. invaded Kuwait only to preserve its own oil interests, and stopped well short of actually taking down Saddam Hussein.

Of course, actually taking down Hussein proved to be a mess of an entirely different magnitude, but Three Kings remains fascinating in part because it seems to understand that its central characters are not acting out of any sort of moral purpose, but only out of their own instincts for survival.

George Clooney has rarely been better

Warner Bros.

George Clooney is one of the great movie stars of his era, and Three Kings features one of his very best performances. Here, he’s playing Archie Gates, a career soldier on the verge of retirement who is disillusioned with the war and with notions of American greatness more generally. Clooney has always been good as the competent cynic, and that’s exactly the role he gets to play here.

He may not have gotten along with Russell while they were making this movie, but it’s undeniably one of his best performances. Clooney also elevates everyone around him, including Wahlberg and Ice Cube, who are both doing career-best work as well.

It’s directed with genuine invention

The cast of Three Kings.
Warner Bros.

Russell’s career has taken many twists and turns in the decades since Three Kings, but this remains the movie in which he seemed most interested in stylistic invention. The movie’s action sequences feature slow-motion, and the camera is often focused on elements that would be ignored in a typical sequence.

What’s more, the entire film has strange, slightly surreal color-grading largely because of the way it was shot and processed, and all of that makes the movie feel remarkable, even by the standards of the era. Not every choice Russell made here works, but it’s hard to deny that he was always trying something new.

It’s angry and ambiguous

The cast of Three Kings
Warner Bros.

Three Kings is an action movie, a comedy, and a drama, but behind each of those elements is an underlying rage. The movie seems to reflect the views of Clooney’s main character, who is utterly exhausted by America’s interventionalist streak and furious that we had claimed victory while leaving a mess in our wake.

What’s more, Three Kings seems to understand that, while America’s politicians may justify war with lofty rhetoric, America’s soldiers are mostly just grunts working jobs. This is a movie that rails against the reasons we make war as much as it rages against this war in particular, and its acerbic sense of humor is a huge part of its central argument.

It manages to be genuinely funny

Three soldiers prepare for battle in Three Kings.
Warner Bros.

You might not expect a movie that is mostly about how stupid the Gulf War was to also be funny, but Russell manages to balance the movie’s tones beautifully. Whereas the anger of the movie comes from how it’s told, the comedy comes from the interpersonal dynamics between its central characters.

Clooney’s cynical major often finds himself at odds with his less educated, less experienced soldiers, and their desperate attempts to improvise their way out of a situation they should not be in are a huge part of why the movie doesn’t feel like a total bummer.

Three Kings can be rented or purchased on Amazon Prime Video.

Topics
Joe Allen
Joe Allen is a freelance writer at Digital Trends, where he covers Movies and TV. He frequently writes streaming…
10 years ago, the most acclaimed superhero movie ever won awards and frustrated audiences
Birdman yells at the screen in Birdman.

The 2010s were a notoriously uneven decade for Best Picture winners -- consider that the trainwreck that is Green Book and the masterpiece that is Parasite won the award back-to-back. Half of the winners were incredibly inspired -- 12 Years a Slave, Spotlight, Moonlight, and The Shape of Water -- while the other half ranged from the forgettable (Argo, The Artist) to the outright mediocre (The King's Speech). And then there's Birdman. From the singular, highly idiosyncratic, and often questionable mind of Alejandro González Iñárritu, Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) is a dark comedy-drama about a washed-up actor, mainly known for a superhero role, trying to stage a comeback with a Broadway adaptation of a Raymond Carver story.

At face value, Birdman looks like a stylistic and technical exercise from one of cinema's most visually interesting yet polarizing auteurs. Unlike many movies, which have deeper layers compared to the first impression they give away, Birdman reinforces it: what you see is what you get, for better and worse. On its 10th anniversary, let's look back at Birdman's unique legacy, discussing how it reshaped the careers of its two leading players -- Iñárritu and Michael Keaton -- and how it became, arguably, the single most eyebrow-raising Best Picture winner of the new millennium.
'I'm trying to do something important.'

Read more
30 years ago, the most unpredictable crime movie of the ’90s changed cinema forever
Marsellus Wallace sits in front of Butch in Pulp Fiction.

It's easy to take an iconic movie for granted. On the rare occasion when a film's reputation or pop cultural impact extends beyond its own limits, it's almost inevitable, in fact, for the movie itself to lose some of its shine. That would seem to be particularly true of Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction, a film that has cast a longer shadow over the past 30 years of movie history than almost any other. Its scenes are still quoted on a regular basis and its imagery continues to be endlessly imitated.

Pulp Fiction | Official Trailer (HD) - John Travolta, Uma Thurman, Samuel L. Jackson | MIRAMAX

Read more
I’ll never watch this harrowing, notorious 40-year-old movie ever again. Here’s why
A policeman wearing a mask stands in Threads.

I saw a few announcements about the October 9 rerun of the BBC film Threads ahead of it playing, and couldn’t quite remember if I had seen it or not. I was probably confusing it with another powerful made-for-TV movie about nuclear war, The Day After. I certainly knew Threads by reputation, though — a bleak depiction of what would happen to normal people in the wake of a nuclear conflict.

After it started it took only a few minutes for me to remember that I had, at some point, seen Threads before. I’m not sure when or how, as it has hardly been shown since its initial debut in 1984. But I knew, and it was a sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach that told me I’d forced the film out of my memory, such is its ability to horrify. Yet I still wasn’t prepared for the ways it can still scare today, 40 years after it was made.
Can a movie cause childhood trauma?
Threads (1984) ORIGINAL TRAILER [HD 1080p]

Read more