Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Honest Trailers pokes fun at the ‘Warcraft’ movie, calls it a ‘high-budget mess’


In spite of its hefty budget and impressive worldwide box office numbers, the Warcraft movie wasn’t exactly considered a runaway success — at least not stateside. Critics and audiences alike had their fair share of complaints,and now Screen Junkies’ Honest Trailers series is airing its own.

Like the Honest Trailers before it, the Warcraft one calls out the film’s flaws, from its overabundance of complicated storylines to its unsatisfying climax. The narrator does not mince words. He calls it “overly ambitious” and a “high-budget mess” — albeit a “gorgeous-looking” one. However, he argues that we are taking baby steps away from video game movies that are “crappy-looking, low-budget messes” and moving toward maybe, someday getting a good one.

Recommended Videos

The video also references the enormous discrepancy between the film’s box office performance in North America compared to overseas. While Warcraft‘s domestic performance was disappointing at roughly $47.23 million, it pulled in $386.31 million internationally, according to Box Office Mojo data.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Not all of the criticism is terrible — the film did earn a 75 percent rating from viewers on Rotten Tomatoes, after all. The narrator likens Warcraft to Game of Thrones given its intriguing themes of betrayal, warring sides, and heroes and villains.  The problem, he suggests, though, is that the film feels like an entire season of the HBO hit “crammed into two hours.”

After poking fun at the actors’ performances, suggesting the expansion pack will have a real ending, and calling Warcraft “the world’s most expensive unskippable cut scene,” the video has one last treat in store for viewers: Matthew Patrick — aka MatPat. The Game Theory stars jumps in after the “noob” narrator calls for help wading through the many characters. They exchange barbs, closing out the trailer with a fun and fitting cameo.

Stephanie Topacio Long
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Stephanie Topacio Long is a writer and editor whose writing interests range from business to books. She also contributes to…
The Flash director says the film failed because people ‘don’t care’ about the DC hero
Barry Allen runs through the Speed Force in The Flash.

It's been nearly two years since The Flash hit theaters in 2023, and the film remains one of the most infamous bombs in recent comic book movie history. Its director, Andy Muschietti, isn't confused about why the film failed, though. During an interview on Radio Tu’s La Baulera del Coso, Muschietti said that he believes The Flash performed so poorly because it wasn't as widely appealing as everyone, including himself and its producers at Warner Bros. Pictures, hoped it would be.

"The Flash failed, among all the other reasons, because it wasn’t a movie that appealed to all four quadrants. It failed at that,” Muschietti argued. “When you spend $200 million making a movie, [Warner Bros.] wants you to bring even your grandmother to the theaters.”

Read more
Sebastian Stan says Thunderbolts is Marvel’s Breakfast Club
Bucky Barnes stands in the desert in Marvel's Thunderbolts.

Marvel Studios may have released only one film last year, but it has three theatrical titles coming in 2025. The movies in question -- February's Captain America: Brave New World, May's Thunderbolts*, and July's The Fantastic Four: First Steps -- all promise to move the Marvel Cinematic Universe's Multiverse Saga forward in their own unique ways. The three also seem very different from each other. Brave New World, for instance, is being marketed as a paranoid political thriller, while Fantastic Four has seemingly adopted a retro-futuristic, '60s-inspired aesthetic.

As for Thunderbolts*, one of the film's stars says that it has more in common with a classic 1980s coming-of-age dramedy than comic book fans may expect. "Thunderbolts* is really interesting because it was so fun, man," Sebastian Stan, who is set to make his MCU return as Bucky Barnes in the forthcoming film, revealed during his recent appearance on Variety's Awards Circuit Podcast. "I'm curious to see how people are going to respond [to it] because the closest [film] that comes [to mind] is that movie The Breakfast Club."

Read more
5 years ago, this sci-fi Alien rip-off drowned at the box office. Is it worthy of reappraisal?
The aqua suits in the movie Underwater

Five years ago in January 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic started to make its first headlines, a different kind of disaster arrived in movie theaters: Underwater. The movie starred Kristen Stewart, and based on the trailers, it looked to pay homage to older sci-fi horror classics. Yet Underwater turned out to be a super clunky, visually murky, and ill-paced film about a deep-sea mining station at the bottom of the Mariana Trench that inadvertently wakes up a giant deep-sea monster.

In theory, Underwater should have been enjoyable. Even if it added nothing to the genre and was just a poor homage to Alien, Cloverfield, and The Abyss, it should have been at least derivative fun. But it wasn't, and audiences stayed away from the big-budget film. So what went wrong, and is Underwater worth watching five years later now that it's available to stream at home?
Why Underwater is a Cthulhu-sized disaster
Underwater | Official Trailer [HD] | 20th Century FOX

Read more