Skip to main content

What happened to the Ghostbusters franchise?

The original Ghostbusters stand on a rooftop together.
Columbia Pictures

2024 marks the 40th anniversary of 1984’s Ghostbusters. In the years since that landmark American comedy was released, the franchise that sprouted from it has produced four big-screen sequels, including a Paul Feig-directed reboot starring an all-female lead cast. Compared to so many of the other popular, seemingly never-ending Hollywood franchises that have emerged over the past four decades, that’s not actually that many sequels. The Ghostbusters franchise has, nonetheless, changed a lot over the years.

For a long time, the franchise’s film side lay dormant. Despite repeated attempts to get it off the ground again, it wasn’t until Feig’s 2016 reboot that any big-screen follow-up to 1989’s Ghostbusters II was released. Five years later, the reboot’s timeline was abandoned when Ghostbusters: Afterlife, a quasi-direct sequel to Ghostbusters II, hit theaters. The film, directed by Ghostbusters director Ivan Reitman’s son, Jason, relocated the franchise from New York City to Oklahoma, and that wasn’t the only major change it made.

Recommended Videos

What made the original Ghostbusters so appealing (and successful)

Trevor, Phoebe, and Podcast stand by the Ecto-1 in Ghostbusters: Afterlife.
Sony Pictures Releasing

Released over 30 years after Ghostbusters II and nearly a decade after the 2014 death of original Ghostbusters co-writer and star Harold Ramis, 2021’s Ghostbusters: Afterlife is a legacy sequel in every sense of the phrase. Not only is it a film made in the long shadow of its widely beloved, decades-old predecessors, but it’s also deeply concerned with the lasting legacy of both the original Ghostbusters and the contributions of its creators. It focuses on the descendants of Ramis’ Egon Spengler, and the actor’s real-life death is weaved into the text of the film — so much so that Reitman and company literally bring in a CGI ghost of Ramis to help save the day in Afterlife‘s climax.

The tastefulness of that creative decision is still up for debate. Beyond the lengths it goes to address the legacy of the original Ghostbusters, though, the film also roots itself in the perspective of Egon’s teenage granddaughter, Phoebe (Mckenna Grace). In doing so, Afterlife abandons the adult world of both Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II in favor of telling a coming-of-age story that, while compelling in parts, only makes the film feel that much more divorced from the franchise’s original, sarcastic sense of humor. 1984’s Ghostbusters is, after all, little more than an extremely goofy comedy about a group of middle-aged men who make a living working suitably bizarre jobs.

The film is elevated by the performances of its exceptional cast and Ivan Reitman’s incredible tonal control, but its narrative ambitions are low, to say the least. The same goes for Ghostbusters II, which is why it’s been truly jarring to see Jason Reitman and Gil Kenan take the franchise in such a different direction over the past three years. Ghostbusters: Afterlife is a family dramedy that, thanks to its sun-burnt Oklahoma aesthetic and grand instances of sci-fi spectacle, looks more like a Steven Spielberg-produced Amblin production than it does anything else. Its sequel, this year’s Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, feels closer in both tone and spirit to the franchise’s first two films, but there are still coming-of-age, family-oriented aspects that seem to exist in direct opposition to the series’ origins.

It’s time for Ghostbusters to grow up again

Slime falls into Finn Wolfhard's hand in Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire.
Jaap Buitendijk / Sony Pictures

The original Ghostbusters is an absurd supernatural sci-fi comedy about a trio of, let’s face it, doofuses who become heroes in spite of their own hang-ups and shared profound lack of self-awareness. There was and still is beauty in both its simplicity and insignificance. Forty years later, the franchise has become a lot bigger and more ambitious, and yet it feels shallower than it used to. By concerning itself so intensely with its own place in pop culture history, the series has taken on a level of narrative weight it was never designed to carry.

Based on most available metrics, it seems like longtime fans don’t mind the franchise’s recent shift in tone, aesthetic, and perspective. When you look at the differences between Ghostbusters and Afterlife and Frozen Empire, though, it’s hard not to squint your eyes at least a little. Is this what time does to all franchises? Or is the modern state of fandom so intense and loud now that no movie or TV show can run a certain length of time without becoming a metatextual commentary on its own supposed greatness?

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire is now playing in theaters.

Topics
Alex Welch
Alex is a writer and critic who has been writing about and reviewing movies and TV at Digital Trends since 2022. He was…
Forget Khan! This Star Trek movie is perhaps the most important one in the franchise’s history
Kirk and crew in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

Among the Star Trek faithful, and even casual movie fans, it's well known that the even-numbered Star Trek movies -- II, IV, VI, and VIII (First Contact) -- are the "good" ones, the one exception being X, Nemesis, which (some would say, mercifully) ended big screen Trek until JJ Abrams' 2009 "Kelvin" timeline reboot.

But there's another exception among the odd-numbered "bad" Trek films that's a bit underrated, and that's Star Trek III: The Search for Spock. While not as inspired as The Wrath of Khan, The Voyage Home, or (my favorite) The Undiscovered Country, the movie still holds up pretty well in terms of story and visual effects. It also remains one of the most emotional and important Trek stories, a fan love-in for characters (and actors) who were already aging 40 years ago when the film premiered in the summer of 1984.
Star Trek III leans heavily on Wrath of Khan (that's a good thing)
The USS Grissom visits Genesis in Star Trek III Paramount

Read more
This might be Netflix’s most disturbing movie. Here’s why it’s still so effective
Two men look down in The Platform.

In 2019, The Platform premiered in theaters and became one of Netflix's most-watched original films the next year. Directed by Galder Gaztelu-Urrutia, this Spanish dystopian thriller follows people imprisoned in a "Vertical Self-Management Center," a tower in which a platform provides food to people on each floor once a day, starting at the top, creating desperation and conflict among the inmates. The film specifically focuses on Goreng (Iván Massagué), who voluntarily admits himself to this prison in exchange for a college degree only to start a revolution from within.
Following the film's tremendous success on streaming during the pandemic, The Platform has returned to the spotlight with a sequel premiering on October 4. Now that this exciting follow-up has descended onto Netflix, here's why audiences should catch up on the original film to prepare for the next course.

Need more recommendations? We also have guides to the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best movies on Amazon Prime Video, the best movies on Max, and the best movies on Disney+.
The characters are compelling

Read more
This 2004 sci-fi thriller has been largely forgotten. Is it still worth remembering in 2024?
A woman sits in a park in The Forgotten.

There's something deeply ironic about a movie called The Forgotten being forgotten two decades after its release. But that's what happens when a movie isn't available on any of the major streaming services like Netflix and physical media is barely hanging on. The only place you can currently stream The Forgotten is Hoopla, and you'll need your library membership to be up to date to watch it there.

The Forgotten was actually a minor hit when it was released in September 2004, earning $117.6 million worldwide against a $42 million budget. In the early 2000s, films like The Forgotten could live on through basic cable showings. Without those constant screenings to remind them about the film, fans aren't that dissimilar from Julianne Moore's character in the movie and were forced to rely on the memories of seeing The Forgotten when it was first released. That was surely not the intention of director Joseph Ruben and screenwriter Gerald Di Pego. But filmmakers don't get to choose which of their movies will be remembered.

Read more