Skip to main content

Google Music introduces scan and match for U.S. users

The idea of a music locker — that is, a cloud service that houses all that juicy, illegally downloaded music you amassed during college — is nothing new. Apple’s iTunes Match service and Amazon’s Cloud Drive both debuted last year to considerable fanfare as they allow users, for $25 a year, to upload their music and listen to it anywhere. Google is now offering a similar service in the States with Google Music … the only difference being that this locker is free. And it’s the best move Google could make when it comes to your music.

Google Music’s new “scan and match” feature went live in Europe last month and hits the U.S. today. Much like iTunes Match, the service scans your music library and matches the tracks to songs in the Google Play store, ready to be played from any computer or your Android device. While Google won’t let you download higher-quality versions of your songs on different devices a la iTunes Match, you can still stream those tracks at higher bitrates, putting the service at feature parity with the competition.

Recommended Videos

But it’s not the features that count. It’s the price, considering that asking for $25 a year to listen to your ill-gotten copy of “The Fame Monster” is not asking the world. Especially when that money would go to the content creators you were pirating from. But when beloved services like Pandora and Spotify already supplement many users’ music libraries today, paying more for what you already own might sound unattractive.

Google is essentially doing with Google Music what they’ve done with Google Docs; giving their service away. In this way, music lovers might see a welcome way of storing all their favorite music, stream the rest in peace, and feel tempted to purchase more from the Google Play store, pulling customers away from Apple and Amazon in the process.

Whether this service can bring about the kind of shift Google wants remains to be seen. But it’s certainly a move worth paying attention to, especially for a product that’s remained rather lifeless since its splashy launch

Kwame Opam
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kwame graduated from Stony Brook University with BA in Anthropology and has a Masters in Media Studies. He's done stints at…
Dolby Atmos Music through Apple’s $549 headphones left us shrugging
Apple AirPods Max

You don't need a dozen speakers to enjoy Dolby Atmos Music anymore. It's now something anyone with an iPhone, an Apple Music subscription, and a set of headphones can hear. In the not-too-distant future, Android users will be able to get in on the Atmos action, too.

But does Dolby Atmos Music actually sound better? Given Apple's spin, plus my own experiences listening to Atmos Music via Tidal on my home theater system, my expectations were very high for Dolby Atmos via headphones.

Read more
You won’t need 17 speakers to appreciate Dolby Atmos in Apple Music
Vizio Dolby Atmos Soundbar

Shortly after Apple’s announcement yesterday that it will be adding lossless music streaming to Apple Music, Twitter was awash with hot takes, mainly in the form of jeers. “Does anyone care about lossless audio files except for the guy I dated in 2008 who made me a CD of FLAC files,” asked Wired senior writer Lauren Goode.

Goode makes a, ahem, good point: Just how big of a deal is lossless audio anyway? The answer is -- for the vast majority of folks, who happily listen to Spotify or Apple Music on an inexpensive set of wired or wireless earbuds -- not a very big deal at all. In fact, these people probably wouldn’t hear much of a difference even if their headphones could let them hear lossless audio, and the fact is, most wireless headphones simply can’t.

Read more
Why the best device for Apple’s lossless music will be an Android phone
A woman wearing the silver Apple AirPods Max.

In recent days, there’s been some talk of Apple launching a new lossless hi-fi audio tier for its Apple Music streaming music service. The leading evidence for such a move is a few lines of code in iOS 14.6 beta spotted by 9to5Mac. Those lines, which have since been removed, referenced “lossless” audio with the Apple Music app.

Apple certainly has competitive reasons to finally venture into the lossless audio category: Spotify, Tidal, Amazon Music, and Qobuz all offer CD-quality or better-than-CD-quality music, which leaves Apple Music as one of the last holdouts. But I can’t help feeling that Apple has boxed itself into a corner when it comes to lossless audio, and I don’t see an easy way out.
Bring back the jack?

Read more