Skip to main content

iPhones will soon block apps from tracking you with unique identifiers

I’d forgive you for not knowing that January 28 is Data Privacy Day, but don’t be surprised that Apple knew. The company hangs its hat on protecting its users’ privacy, and is all too happy to point out the myriad ways apps, websites, and other companies can hold your data and track you. Following up on announcements made at the Worldwide Developers Conference last year, Apple’s ready to make its next big step in user privacy: Turning off cross-app user tracking by default on the iPhone.

Starting with an upcoming iOS 14 release, Apple will block all apps from tracking users using a phone’s unique IDFA, or Identifier for Advertisers, unless given explicit consent by the user. This has huge ramifications for the ways apps track users to target them for advertising and customization services, and it’s happening in one fell swoop.

Recommended Videos

You used to have to fight to stop tracking; now, it’ll be off by default.

Think of the IDFA as a fingerprint that identifies you specifically, allowing your usage data to be linked between apps and services. It’s like a browser cookie, only you can’t periodically “clear” it. Once you update your iPhone (or iPad), apps will immediately lose access to that IDFA and have to request access again. You’ll be able to approve use of your IDFA on an app-by-app basis, and if you don’t, the app will have no way to access it. It’s exactly the same as giving apps access to your location, for example.

Better yet, you can revoke access to your IDFA at any time from Settings, just like any other permission. And if you want to go as far as possible, you can even block apps from requesting your IDFA. It’s comprehensive.

Apps will have just one chance to request tracking, and you always have control.

One chance

Apple isn’t specifying which update to iOS this will take effect, but says that the functionality will be in place with a Beta release prior to a public launch. Developers shouldn’t be caught off guard by this in the slightest though, given everything Apple’s said in the past and implemented in terms of privacy disclosure requirements.

Apps will have only one chance to request to track you using your IDFA, and Apple says that developers will be able to customize some of the text displayed to explain why they are requesting that access. But apps won’t be allowed to withhold access to features, or offer payment, in exchange for enabling tracking. If developers are found to be subverting the system in any way, they can be at risk of being removed from the App Store.

This change applies to every app on the iPhone and iPad, including Apple’s own, though the consequences for non-Apple apps are substantial. Apps have been built specifically to leverage tracking through the IDFA for advertising targeting — directly or in aggregate — and this change completely upends that model.

We’ll have to wait to see just how apps try and message this change to their users, but I can’t imagine many people will opt to turn on tracking. Unlike giving permission to use the camera, microphone, or location, there isn’t any easily describable user benefit to enabling IDFA tracking. On the face of it, it just looks like the only party to benefit is the app developer.

Apple

That’s not to say that apps don’t have other ways of tracking you, of course. Any app that requires a sign-in naturally has the ability to track your activity, particularly if there are multiple apps in use from a single company. There are also considerably advanced technologies that aggregate many seemingly disparate bits of data on people to form patterns and create a profile of a user, which won’t necessarily be thwarted by this change.

The tech-savvy among us have a general understanding that data collected from our web-browsing history and phones can be correlated to paint a pretty detailed picture of who we are, what we do, what we’re interested in, and where we go. But you’d be surprised by how little the average person understands about the situation. Despite the fact that it’s in Apple’s best interest to make this information known, it’s primarily in everyone’s interest to have the broad public understand how much data is collected from us.

On this Data Privacy Day, do just a little reading up on how you’re being tracked online, in apps, and on your devices. You’ll be better off for it.

Andrew Martonik
Andrew Martonik is the Editor in Chief at Digital Trends, leading a diverse team of authoritative tech journalists.
I tested the most popular free antivirus apps for Mac. Here are the very best
A MacBook Air is shown with the Bitdefender for Mac dashboard open.

The best free antivirus software for your Mac offers robust protection without breaking the bank. Although macOS was once an unlikely target for hackers, that's changing. As Apple computers become more popular, malware prevention is increasingly important to safeguard your personal and financial data.
Finding the best antivirus software can be challenging. While subscription prices are affordable, your budget might already be tight. Thankfully, there are several good, free malware solutions for macOS. Here are our top picks for free antivirus software for Mac, with each specially tailored to protect your Apple computer.
Avast One Basic

While Avast One Basic is free and shows no ads, this powerful antivirus software still protects your Mac from malware infections, and blocks new threats before they become a problem. Perhaps more impressive is the Web Shield feature that identifies malicious downloads and prevents access to hazardous websites, halting phishing attempts and other online dangers.

Read more
5 phones you should buy instead of the iPhone 16
Someone holding the iPhone 16.

Apple’s iPhone 16 has arrived, and it’s quite an impressive offering this year. Not only does it come in some of the best colors we’ve seen in a while, but it closes the gap between the base and Pro models even more.

That's all to say the iPhone 16 is a fantastic phone, but if you’re thinking about buying it as your next smartphone purchase, you should also consider some of these alternatives.
iPhone 16 Plus

Read more
Blood oxygen tracking isn’t coming back to the Apple Watch anytime soon
Apple Watch Ultra taking a measurement for blood oxygen levels.

One of the major selling points of Apple Watches in recent years has been the ability to test users’ blood oxygen levels. Unfortunately, ongoing litigation has prevented this feature from being included in Apple Watches sold in the U.S. since January. Now, it seems unlikely that this situation will change soon.

On Friday, a Delaware jury found that health-monitoring technology company Masimo infringed on some of Apple’s earlier smartwatch patents. As a result, Apple received an award of only $250. However, the same jury ruled that Masimo's current watches did not infringe on the patents that Apple accused it of copying. Consequently, an injunction remains in effect in the U.S. that prevents the company from offering blood oxygen tracking on new watches sold in the country.

Read more