Skip to main content

China’s coronavirus app will only inspire panic, experts say

In epidemic or disaster situations, information is often the antidote to panic. So it would follow that in the current panic surrounding the coronavirus, knowing who’s infected might help.

It seems that in this light, the Chinese government has launched an app that tracks who has been infected with coronavirus (something it knows based onpopulation surveillance), and will alert users if they come in “close contact” with an infected person.

Recommended Videos

“From a Chinese perspective, this is a really useful service for people … Provided it’s done in a transparent way, with consent where needed,” Hong Kong-based analyst Carolyn Bigg told the BBC.

Man in Wuhan wearing a mask amid coronavirus outbreak
A man wears a protective mask as he stands under the Yangtze River Bridge on February 11 in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. Getty Images

But other experts say it’s unlikely it’ll calm anyone’s fears. Alain Labrique, associate professor at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, called the app “quite unsettling.”

Potential for misinformation

Labrique told Digital Trends that in this type of situation, there is an inevitable rush to see what technologies can be used to assuage the outbreak. But this, in his mind, is the wrong approach. For one, it could contribute to the spread of misinformation. “The absence of information and misinformation is almost as big a threat as the virus itself at this time,” said Labrique

“We use the term ‘garbage in, garbage out,’” he told Digital Trends. “In more polite terms, it means you have to consider the reliability and accuracy of the data. Are the conclusions that are being presented to the users of this app valid? I have grave concerns of the validity of the classifications of people based on some measure of proximity.”

This means, at best, the app is providing inaccurate information. At worst, it could actually cause more discrimination, and exacerbate tensions, suspicions, and panic.

“There’s a very high possibility that people will panic,” Dariusz Jemielniak, professor of digital society at Kozminski University in Warsaw, Poland, told Digital Trends. “I don’t think this is a good thing. This is a bad thing. They are fearmongering through the app.”

False sense of security

The app, Labrique said, is probably not able to effectively detect who is contagious and who isn’t. There may be people who are asymptomatic or have low-grade, undetectable symptoms who are nonetheless contagious.

“If the app is unable to capture those individuals, fundamentally, it is providing them with a false sense of security and false sense of non-exposure, which is also dangerous,” Labrique said. “People might let down their guard and stop following routine practices like washing their hands.” Because of this, health experts around the world are expressing consternation regarding China’s containment strategy, he said.

“If there was an actual risk, and the government knows something about a person, then that person should be contacted individually,” said Jemielniak. “This app is entirely redundant. It’s just a show of power in the bigger picture. It shows how close the state’s individual surveillance is. For everyday people, it’s not necessary to have this information, unless they need to immediately go see a doctor. And in this case, they don’t need an app to tell them that.”

An appropriate use of the technology would be to provide reliable advice and connect people to care providers when they need it.

“They [the government] are trying to demonstrate to the populace that measures are being taken to protect people,” said Labrique. “But it’s largely a political play to demonstrate that things are being handled. What we really need are communities coming together and fighting spread of virus together, and being supportive of people who are ill. This kind of thing further deepens the rifts between ’us’ and ‘them.’”

Maya Shwayder
I'm a multimedia journalist currently based in New England. I previously worked for DW News/Deutsche Welle as an anchor and…
Contact-tracing apps were the biggest tech failure of the COVID-19 pandemic
contact tracing apps failed covid 19 pandemic

The automated contact-tracing system deployed by Google and Apple that was aimed at curbing the spread of COVID-19 has been, in no uncertain terms, a complete failure. The basic system's effectiveness has been called into question continuously. The apps built on the system have been, frankly, useless — that is, in regions where apps were built at all. And now 10 months after the announcement that was supposed to be pivotal in our fight to stop the spread, we have exactly zero evidence that shows it was helpful in the slightest.

A flawed system
The system itself, on a technical level, is the root of the problem. In an effort to provide something that could be used universally, while also protecting users' privacy, Google and Apple came up with a system that was doomed to be useless. It didn't use GPS or cell tower triangulation, which I appreciate from a privacy standpoint, but that means it relied on Bluetooth LE (low energy) signals to determine proximity and duration of proximity.

Read more
Apple has revealed the best apps of 2020. Here’s what they reveal about us
App store icon showing three notifications.

In today’s tempestuous times, apps aren’t just tools to help us level a painting or get through the next meeting: They’re our lifeblood, the way we meet with friends, wind down, stay healthy. With COVID-19 confinement and work-from-home policies shaping our daily lives in ways we would have found unthinkable just a year ago (“What do you mean, the movie theater is shutting down??”), the right apps can help us get through it all.

With an eye toward the changing world, Apple today unveiled its picks for the best apps of 2020 -- a collection of games, tools, and utilities that have shone throughout this year -- and also unveiled a new physical award that the company mailed out to the 15 apps that made the grade. Collectively, they offer an interesting window on the pandemic, as work and school were utterly changed, and entirely new forms of distraction were a must.

Read more
The best dating apps for dating during the coronavirus pandemic
youtube red swipe right tinder app mem 2

By the end of March 2020, 32 out of 50 U.S. states were in lockdown -- and on Sunday, March 29, there were more swipes on Tinder than on any other day in the app's history. Fast forward eight months and the world is a very different place as we all adjust to the "new normal," with no signs of social distancing going anywhere soon. There's no doubt the coronavirus pandemic is changing the playbook for dating in person, with online dating seeing a surge in popularity as stay-at-home advice and social distancing influence the way we meet and mingle with potential partners. So, if you're single right now, how do you get your dating fix?

Some of the world's most popular dating apps are capitalizing on features like in-app video chat, real-time virtual events, and gamification features that allow users to enjoy virtual dates without the need for in-person meetings. Navigating the world of online dating isn't always easy, and we've already covered some of the best dating apps for 2020 -- but here you'll find some of the best dating apps for dating during the coronavirus pandemic, for iOS and Android. Some are familiar apps that have launched new features and concepts to make virtual dating easier and more fun, while others you may not have heard of yet.
Kippo

Read more