Skip to main content

Researchers say your GPU could expose private info online

In an age of increased online privacy awareness, many of us are conscious of our digital fingerprints and prefer not to be tracked. However, it may not be as simple as it previously seemed.

An international team of researchers has found that users can be tracked down by their graphics cards. This is done through a new technique referred to as “GPU fingerprinting.”

An example of the GPU fingerprinting technique.
An example of the GPU fingerprinting technique showcasing two identical GPUs that still produce different results. Image used with permission by copyright holder

This new technology, named DrawnApart by the researchers and first reported by Bleeping Computer, relies on the tiny differences between each piece of hardware in order to make a distinction that ties it to a certain user. Through a series of identifiers, researchers find that they are able to track down individual users, as well as their online activity, just by implementing this new technique.

Recommended Videos

The team spans several countries and universities, including researchers from Israel, France, and Australia, who published their findings online in a paper on Arxiv.org. They showcased examples of the GPU fingerprinting technique, which relies on the fact that no components are exactly the same — even if they are all part of the same model and were made by the same manufacturer.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

There are tiny differences in the performance, power consumption, and processing capabilities of every graphics card. DrawnApart takes advantage of that by using fixed workloads based on the Web Graphics Library (WebGL). This is a cross-platform JavaScript-based application programming interface (API) responsible for rendering graphics within any compatible web browser.

Using WebGL, DrawnApart targets the GPU’s shaders with a special sequence of graphic operations that were made specifically for this task. The drawing operations are ultra-precise and make it easier for the researchers to tell the graphics cards apart, and this includes cards of the same make and model.

Once the task is complete, the technique produces an accurate trace with timing measurements that includes how long it takes the card to handle stall functions, complete vertex renders, and more. As the timing is individual to each GPU, this results in making the unit trackable.

DrawnApart tracking duration diagram.
DrawnApart: Average tracking time by collection period graph. Image used with permission by copyright holder

The research team finds that this technique provides a high degree of accuracy and is an improvement over existing tracking methods. The algorithm was tested on a large sample of more than 2,500 unique devices and 371,000 fingerprints, and the researchers noted a 67% improvement compared to using only current fingerprinting methods without DrawnApart. In its current state, DrawnApart can fingerprint a graphics card in just eight seconds.

Eight seconds is ultrafast as it is, but there is potential for even more accurate and quicker tracking through the use of newer, faster APIs. The team tested using compute shader operations instead and found that the results were now up to 98% accurate and only took 150 milliseconds to achieve.

Although the findings are impressive, it’s impossible to deny that they’re also terrifying. We’ve all grown used to declining cookies on various websites, but DrawnApart proves that may soon not be enough. The research team is also keenly aware of the potential for misuse that the GPU fingerprint poses.

“This is a substantial improvement to stateless tracking, obtained through the use of our new fingerprinting method. […] We believe it raises practical concerns about the privacy of users being subjected to fingerprinting,” said the researchers in their paper.

As the GPU fingerprinting technique may not require additional permissions, users could be subjected to it by simply browsing the internet. Khronos, the organization in charge of the WebGL library, is already exploring ways in which to prevent the technique from being used maliciously.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
Reviewers hated this AMD GPU. Here’s why I still recommend it
AMD RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT graphics cards.

It's rare that reviewers universally hate a graphics card, but most wouldn't put AMD's RX 7700 XT among the best graphics cards you can buy. As you can read in my own combo review of the RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT, the latter GPU just didn't make sense when it launched more than a year ago. Time has marched on, however, and the RX 7700 XT doesn't get the respect it deserves today.

You probably have a negative assumption about this graphics card, and I wouldn't blame you. Tom's Hardware said the GPU got stuck "between a proverbial rock and hard place," while TechSpot was even more harsh: "Purchasing the Radeon 7700 XT at $450 is ill-advised when the 7800 XT is available, leaving us questioning AMD's rationale behind this launch." User reactions were harsher still.

Read more
A PC ‘recession’ could make hardware way more expensive, says researcher
The RTX 4080 in a running test bench.

Get ready to spend big if you plan on scoring one of the best graphics cards or best processors. According to Jon Peddie Research, the PC market could be headed for a "recession" due to proposed tariffs on several countries, which are said to go into effect shortly after Donald Trump becomes president on January 20.

The quote comes from JPR's third-quarter GPU market study. Market share has shifted a bit, CPU shipments are up by 12%, but there really isn't much to write home about -- short of the tariffs. "AMD and Intel released new CPUs, and there was some pent-up demand for them. However, looking forward, we think that if the proposed tariffs are imposed, the PC market will suffer a recession due to increased prices and unmatched increases in income," wrote Dr. Jon Peddie.

Read more
Intel’s new $249 GPU brings 1440p gaming to the masses
An exploded view of Intel's Arc A580 GPU.

Intel is trying to redefine what a "budget GPU" really means in 2024, and it's doing so with the new Arc B580 GPU. In what Intel itself described as its "worst kept secret," the B580 is the debut graphics card in Intel's new Battlemage range of discrete GPUs, and it's arriving at just $249. That's a price point that's been relegated to 1080p for decades, but Intel says the B580 will change that dynamic.

It's a 1440p GPU, at least by Intel's definition. That's despite the fact that Intel is comparing the card to GPUs like the RTX 4060 and RX 7600, both of which are more expensive than the B580 and squarely target 1080p. Intel says it can deliver higher performance than these two GPUs while undercutting the price, all in an attempt to capitalize on 1440p gamers. "1440p is becoming 1080p," as Intel's Tom Petersen put it in a pre-briefing with the press.

Read more