Skip to main content

Jarvisen Translator Review: A translator for serious travel

The Jarvisen Translator can handle up to 60 languages in less than a second

jarvisen translator review translation
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Jarvisen Translator Review: A translator for serious travel
MSRP $429.00
“The Jarvisen Translator isn't inexpensive, but it easily beats the speed and quality of app-based translators.”
Pros
  • Small form factor
  • Excellent voice recognition
  • Fast response time
  • Built-in data support
  • 60 languages included
Cons
  • Too sensitive to ambient noise
  • Needs more offline languages
  • Expensive

Traveling without knowing a lick of the local tongue can be daunting for anyone, especially when left with little other recourse communicating in a foreign land. Popular apps, like Google Translate and, by extension, its Interpreter mode, are options, but not always available. Nor are they as fast as the Jarvisen Translate, a handheld device that can translate up to 60 languages in real-time in as little as 0.5 seconds.

Recommended Videos

Its singular focus could seem a few years too late, but there’s reason to use this instead of your phone.

It’s not a flip phone, honest!

At first glance, the Jarvisen Translator looks like a cell phone from a bygone era. Black, slim, with a small screen and few buttons, it’s not exactly a head-turner. It’s also not immediately obvious what it does if someone were to peek at it after you pulled it out of your pocket. This neutrality fits with the device’s mantra of being an accessible interpreter.

There’s not a lot to it once you unbox it and get started. The device comes with a leather pouch for added protection, plus a fabric-lined USB-C cable to charge it. That’s it.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The software is nicely laid out and user-friendly on the 3-inch touchscreen. Keeping things basic, the home screen displays the date and time, along with the two languages for translation. The top one, noted with a blue dot, is the one the device listens for, while the bottom one, with the red dot, is the language it will translate to. Those are also represented by corresponding physical buttons under the display, plus a home button in the middle.

A “Say Hi” button is a canned greeting introducing the device to the listener and asking for general help. Swipe right and the translation history is laid out, text message-style. Swipe left, and you have a shortcut to the settings.

There is a SIM card slot on the left side, with power and volume buttons on the right. Despite that slot, the device supports eSIM, so it came with connectivity out of the box.

Speakers are arrayed both the front and back. Though this is decidedly not a smartphone, it does have 16GB of internal storage and 2GB of RAM onboard. The battery is rated to last for eight hours.

Making connections

The Translator has decent connectivity options, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, but it’s the 4G LTE part that stands out more. The company says the device has global coverage in 98 countries and regions worldwide, with two years of that included at the $500 pricing option. For $429, the device comes with no built-in data.

Users can top up after the initial two-year coverage expires by signing up for a new plan on the website. Those who went without built-in data can add the global coverage plan at any time.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Having a wireless connection ready to go takes away the need to carry a phone as a wireless tether, or as a translation tool unto itself. But how does accuracy differ from what phones and apps can already do?

Jarvisen claims speech recognition is 95% accurate. The first piece of that linguistic puzzle is the 4-Mic far-field microphone array that runs with “smart noise reduction” and an octa-core Snapdragon processor. That combination is what ultimately delivers the 0.5-second response time.

Its speed is as advertised. Without question, the device synthesizes speech faster than any app I’ve tried to date. It doesn’t wait until someone finishes speaking, but translates on the fly as it picks up the speaker’s voice.

Its translation quality is better than you might expect, with a bit of local flair thrown in, particularly when translating Spanish and Portuguese. It even has professional vocabulary coverage, so can recognize lingo in the medical, finance, legal, and engineering fields.

But language is full of nuance, and that’s where things can get tricky. Dialects can differ dramatically. Arabic comes to mind, where the dialect spoken in Morocco will sound completely different from that spoken in Iraq.

English and French aren’t that different in that regard, either. A Scottish dialect is going to come off differently from a Jamaican one, just like Haitian and Quebecois French are not the same as what people in France usually speak.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

So, while translation is technically correct word-for-word, the nuance and spirit of the words are sometimes lost in translation. For example, there are some common refrains in Greek that would make little sense when translated to someone using the device. That’s the difficulty facing translation tools. Words aren’t that difficult to translate, but accurately depicting their meaning can get tricky.

There’s just a few offline translations you can download and install by going to Settings>Offline Translation. As of this review, English<>Chinese, Japanese<>Chinese, Korean<>Chinese, and Russian<>Chinese were the only options. Still, that’s not nothing.

Google has improved offline access and accuracy for its Translate app, but the company has acknowledged it may not be as accurate as it is when online. All other offline translation I’ve tried pales in comparison to this device.

Battery Life

Since it’s not a phone or wireless headphones, the Translator is consistent with how long it lasts per charge. On standby, it’s rated to last six days on 4G LTE, 10 days on Wi-Fi, and 17 days without any network connection. It’s harder to measure how long it lasts when you’re using it, but I’d say 8 to 10 hours is typical. This isn’t a device you’ll have to charge every day.

It charges via USB-C, so a typical smartphone cable offers a way to top up when necessary.

Our Take

At $429 without data and $500 with two years included, this is an expensive device to buy for a vacation. Repeat travel to foreign lands is where it may pay off. Also, if you run a business where dealing with non-English speakers is common, this could be a quicker way to work with them. The speed and accuracy are impressive, so it comes down to how quickly Jarvisen updates it and improves upon what’s already there.

Is there a better alternative?

The most obvious alternative is Google Translate and the Interpreter mode that recently carried over from its Home devices to Android and iOS. It’s pretty good, and works both ways, translating the two languages over the course of the conversation. There are no real buttons to press, and it supports 44 languages. It works on devices people already own and carry with them, though you will need a data connection to use it outside of a Wi-Fi network.

That’s not to say the Jarvisen Translator doesn’t have direct competitors trying to do the same thing. Pocketalk translates up to 74 languages and comes at a lower price, but isn’t as fast or accurate. iIi specializes in offline translation, but it’s limited to only a few languages and doesn’t truly allow for two-way translations.

How long will it last?

The device isn’t water-resistant, so keeping it free of rain or an accidental toilet dip is a must to keep it safe. However, it’s not so much the hardware, but rather the software that will really determine how far it goes. Language translation, especially when there’s some element of machine learning involved, needs constant refinement.

So far, it looks like Jarvisen is serious about improving on what it has here, and that’s good news. The company doesn’t have the resources Google and other tech behemoths do, but at least there’s a focus on getting it right when people are speaking different languages to one another.

Should you buy it?

Yes, though this isn’t a device for a short vacation. This is for serious travelers who spend weeks or months away from home.

Ted Kritsonis
A tech journalism vet, Ted covers has written for a number of publications in Canada and the U.S. Ted loves hockey, history…
Simon Pegg says The Final Reckoning is the best Mission: Impossible movie yet
Tom Cruise stares with a concerned look on his face.

In addition to being one of the longest-running franchises, Mission: Impossible has also managed to retain an impressive level of quality. The teaser for Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning suggests that the next installment will keep that trend alive, and now, star Simon Pegg has said that the next chapter may even be the best in the entire franchise.

On Inside of You with Michael Rosenbaum, Pegg said that he had just finished shooting and was ready to hype the film up. "I have just finished shooting. I have one day left of pickups to do," he explained. "I've seen it. It's bananas. It's absolutely bananas. What he does in this one, it boggles the mind. I think this one is the best one ever. And I'm not just saying that because it's like, 'Oh, you've got to say that.' It is going to be great."

Read more
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
The uncertain future cost of Apple’s Emergency SOS feature
Person holding iPhone 14 searching for Emergency SOS satellite.

It's been roughly two years since the launch of the iPhone 14 and its Emergency SOS via satellite feature. You might recall that during the first two years, Apple said it would be free to use but that it might require a subscription after that time, according to MacRumors. Last year, Apple extended the time limit by one more year, so you actually have until November 2025, when the trial period ends.

That's good news. The Emergency SOS feature is, quite literally, lifesaving. During April of this year, three university students lost their way in a canyon and used the feature to call for help. Another story arose in July where the feature came through once more in a moment of crisis. And if you keep digging, you'll find numerous other examples of how this tech is truly beneficial.

Read more