Skip to main content

New lawsuit accuses Juul of targeting kids on Nick Jr. and Cartoon Network sites

Juul has been hit with another lawsuit over its marketing practices toward minors. The new lawsuit alleges that the e-cigarette company advertised on such websites as Nickelodeon, Nick Jr., Seventeen Magazine, and Cartoon Network. 

Recommended Videos

The lawsuit was filed on Wednesday by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey and focuses on the company’s advertising campaign in 2015. The suit alleges that Juul purchased advertising space on websites geared toward children and minors. Aside from the companies above, the lawsuit also mentions coolmath-games.com and socialstudiesforkids.com.

Juul
Robyn Beck / Getty Images

“Juul is responsible for the millions of young people nationwide who are addicted to e-cigarettes, reversing decades of progress in combating underage tobacco and nicotine use,” Healey said in the press release. “Our lawsuit sheds new light on the company’s intent to target young people, and we are going to make them pay for the public health crisis they caused in Massachusetts.”

Juul did not immediately respond to our request for comment on the lawsuit. We will update this story when we hear back.

The lawsuit also seeks details on how Juul was able to sell e-cigarettes to underage users through its website, specifically to Massachusetts addresses that did not verify age.

Healey claims that Juul also attempted to recruit celebrities like Miley Cyrus and Kristen Stewart, as well as influencers on social media with a large following. to promote the company’s products. 

These claims are similar to a Federal Trade Commision’s (FTC) investigation that started in August 2019. The FTC is looking into Juul’s hiring of influencers to promote its e-cigarette products and whether influencers were used to attract minors.

Juul previously told Digital Trends that its paid influencer campaign was “short-lived” in 2018 and that it spent “less than $10,000” on influencers.

In November, New York Attorney General Letitia James announced a lawsuit against Juul for the “deceptive and misleading marketing of its e-cigarettes.” 

Federal authorities also began a criminal investigation into the company in September, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is conducting its own investigation into the Juul’s practices as well.

Amid last year’s vaping illness epidemic, San Francisco, where Juul is headquartered, became the first city in the U.S. to ban the sales of e-cigarettes. Since then, Massachusetts, Michigan, California, and New York have enacted similar bans on vaping products due to health concerns. President Donald Trump has also said that he wants to ban flavored e-cigarettes nationwide and issue new regulatory guidance on vapes. 

Last month, the FDA officially banned fruit- and mint-flavored e-cigarette cartridges currently on the market, including Juul’s products.

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
The uncertain future cost of Apple’s Emergency SOS feature
Person holding iPhone 14 searching for Emergency SOS satellite.

It's been roughly two years since the launch of the iPhone 14 and its Emergency SOS via satellite feature. You might recall that during the first two years, Apple said it would be free to use but that it might require a subscription after that time, according to MacRumors. Last year, Apple extended the time limit by one more year, so you actually have until November 2025, when the trial period ends.

That's good news. The Emergency SOS feature is, quite literally, lifesaving. During April of this year, three university students lost their way in a canyon and used the feature to call for help. Another story arose in July where the feature came through once more in a moment of crisis. And if you keep digging, you'll find numerous other examples of how this tech is truly beneficial.

Read more
Apple’s smart home display already sounds like a convenience victory
Nest Hub Max

Over the past few weeks, rumors of Apple developing a smart display for home control have picked up pace. The company is said to be developing two versions, and one of them might even feature a robotic arm and revive an iconic Mac’s design. 

Now, Bloomberg has shared some juicy details about how the entry-level option will look and work. The device will offer a 6-inch screen with a square-ish format flanked by sensors, including a FaceTime camera in landscape orientation. 

Read more