Skip to main content

Sony in final talks to buy movie rights to Steve Jobs bio

Sony Pictures is believed to be in final talks to acquire the movie rights to the forthcoming and eagerly awaited Steve Jobs biography.

According to a report by Hollywood blog Deadline, the deal could be worth several million dollars. Sony had a big hit last year with another biopic, the Oscar-winning The Social Network, based on Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg.

Recommended Videos

The Steve Jobs biography, written by former CNN chairman and Time Magazine managing editor Walter Isaacson, was previously set for publication on November 21. However, following the Apple co-founder’s death on Wednesday, publisher Simon & Schuster announced that it was bringing the date forward to October 24. 

Isaacson’s book is the result of more than 40 interviews with Steve Jobs conducted over a period of two years. Family, friends, co-workers and business competitors also contributed. Substantial pre-orders of the publication have pushed it to the top of Amazon.com’s best seller list. The digital version also tops the book chart in Apple’s iTunes store.

As pointed out by Deadline, up to now only one other movie has profiled the life of the tech giant. Pirates of Silicon Valley, a made-for-TV production broadcast in 1999, saw Falling Skies actor Noah Wyle take on the role of Jobs.

The Apple co-founder enjoyed Wyle’s performance so much that he invited the actor to make an appearance at the 1999 Macworld event in New York. As you can see from the video below, his impersonation of Jobs at the event went down a storm. 

It’s a safe bet any movie chronicling the life of Steve Jobs will also be a big hit.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
If you use one of these passwords, hackers will love you
Username and password on a tablet screen.

You would think that at this point, people would be using stronger passwords. Sorry to disappoint you, but according to NordPass' annual list of the world's most popular passwords, the unoriginal choices are a letdown.

123456 is the back-to-back champ for the most common and easiest password. But on the bright side, at least "password" doesn't have the No. 1 spot like it did in the past. The remaining top spots go to passwords such as:

Read more
Everything on Amazon’s new ‘Haul’ store costs less than $20
Amazon's new Haul shopping site.

Amazon has just launched a new store full of stuff costing no more than $20. It’s the tech behemoth’s way of taking on the likes of Chinese retailers Temu and Shein, whose own bargains are becoming increasingly popular with online shoppers in the U.S.

Currently in beta, Amazon’s new store, called Haul, is a mobile-only offering and will appear as a new tab on the company’s shopping app after the next time you update it. Alternatively, visit www.amazon.com/haul on your phone’s web browser.

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more