Skip to main content

HBO releasing the Snyder Cut of Justice League shows toxic fans are winning

The Snyder Cut is being released — and toxic fans are scoring yet another win.

HBO and Warner Bros. announced Wednesday that the infamous and mythical version of the superhero blockbuster Justice League as originally conceived by Zack Snyder not only exists but will soon be released on streaming site HBO Max.

Justice-League
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In their announcement, the companies even acknowledged the ever-present demands from the vocal fanatics who for years have demanded that the studio release what they say is the true version of the much-maligned flick.

Recommended Videos

“Since I got here 14 months ago, the chant to #ReleaseTheSnyderCut has been a daily drumbeat in our offices and inboxes,” said Warner Bros. exec Robert Greenblat. “Well, the fans have asked, and we are thrilled to finally deliver.”

“At the end of the day, it really is all about them,” he added.

It really is.

Like other studios before it, Warner Bros. has caved in to the loudest and most toxic of its fans, proving once more that harassment and targeted social media swarms have the biggest sway in Hollywood.

Rumors swirl

Justice League review
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The story of the “Snyder Cut” began, as so many things do now, on social media.

Snyder — who had directed the two previous films in the DC Extended Universe, Man of Steel and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice — was tapped to direct the Avengers-like team-up DC fans had been waiting for: Justice League. But Snyder was forced to step down from the film just six months before its release after his daughter tragically passed away.

Joss Whedon, the man behind Marvel’s smash hit, stepped in to handle post-production duties and ultimately helmed numerous reshoots and tweaks to the film’s script.

Justice League released in 2017 with an ominous thud. Critics were mixed at best on the film and the box office results were disappointing, with some reports claiming Warner Bros would lose money.

The conspiracy spreads

Justice League
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In the face of commercial and critical mediocrity, a vocal part of the DC fan base was poised to offer a retort. A subset of the DC fanbase had long defended Snyder after he was criticized for his previous two DC films. Some paranoid fans claimed that critics had a personal vendetta against him, or even that Disney had influenced critics to destroy its competitor’s reputation.

Snyder’s films — dark and brooding and joyless — were “mature,” these vocal fans claimed. If Snyder’s true vision for Justice League was revealed, it would prove that he was the visionary they all knew he was.

This kind of hero worship isn’t anything new with fanbases. But Snyder himself stoked the fires, coyly posting deleted scenes from the movie. Some of the movie’s stars, including Gal Gadot and Ben Affleck, soon joined the call to release Snyder’s original plan for the film, amplifying the vocal fans’ outcry.

Many of those who pushed for the cut to be released used the attention to promote noble, charitable causes. Fans, for example, raised a staggering $150,000 for suicide prevention services earlier this year.

But the toxic fans were emboldened too. For years, they bombarded social media accounts with threats and insults. And now Warner Bros. is caving in.

The fandom menace

This isn’t the first time a studio has capitulated to its loudest, most toxic fans. Disney’s confused Star Wars sequel trilogy was capped off with Rise of Skywalker, a movie that seemed intent on ret-conning everything its loudest fans had condemned. Rey’s backstory was abruptly switched, Snoke finally got his reveal, and the Emperor was back out of nowhere.

But most damningly, new character Rose was sidelined. A Rebel mechanic who debuted in The Last Jedi, Rose was despised by some in the Star Wars fanbase. As some railed that the movie had ruined their childhood, a sizable chunk of critics framed her inclusion as evidence of what they deemed “forced diversity” in the film, a term fraught with racist undertones. They harassed Asian-American actor Kelly Marie Tran on social media constantly, ultimately driving her off Instagram.

How did Disney respond? They threw her character under the bus and all-but-erased her from the franchise.

Toxic fans are unfortunately an inevitability in a digital world where threats and harassment can be tossed out with the touch of a few buttons on social media and just as easily forgotten. Studios don’t have to give those voices power.

But they have been. Like Disney before it, Warner Bros. has made the calculation that the publicity and potential revenue is worth selling out to the nastiest few.

Those who campaigned loudest for the Snyder Cut to be released, who threatened and insulted those who dared oppose them, now know they’re being listened to. Time and time again, studios are proving that the tactics they use work.

After all, at the end of the day, it really is all about them.

Paul Squire
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Paul is the News Editor at Digital Trends. Before joining DT, Paul spent 3 years as an editor on the New York Post's digital…
The Flash director says the film failed because people ‘don’t care’ about the DC hero
Barry Allen runs through the Speed Force in The Flash.

It's been nearly two years since The Flash hit theaters in 2023, and the film remains one of the most infamous bombs in recent comic book movie history. Its director, Andy Muschietti, isn't confused about why the film failed, though. During an interview on Radio Tu’s La Baulera del Coso, Muschietti said that he believes The Flash performed so poorly because it wasn't as widely appealing as everyone, including himself and its producers at Warner Bros. Pictures, hoped it would be.

"The Flash failed, among all the other reasons, because it wasn’t a movie that appealed to all four quadrants. It failed at that,” Muschietti argued. “When you spend $200 million making a movie, [Warner Bros.] wants you to bring even your grandmother to the theaters.”

Read more
Sebastian Stan says Thunderbolts is Marvel’s Breakfast Club
Bucky Barnes stands in the desert in Marvel's Thunderbolts.

Marvel Studios may have released only one film last year, but it has three theatrical titles coming in 2025. The movies in question -- February's Captain America: Brave New World, May's Thunderbolts*, and July's The Fantastic Four: First Steps -- all promise to move the Marvel Cinematic Universe's Multiverse Saga forward in their own unique ways. The three also seem very different from each other. Brave New World, for instance, is being marketed as a paranoid political thriller, while Fantastic Four has seemingly adopted a retro-futuristic, '60s-inspired aesthetic.

As for Thunderbolts*, one of the film's stars says that it has more in common with a classic 1980s coming-of-age dramedy than comic book fans may expect. "Thunderbolts* is really interesting because it was so fun, man," Sebastian Stan, who is set to make his MCU return as Bucky Barnes in the forthcoming film, revealed during his recent appearance on Variety's Awards Circuit Podcast. "I'm curious to see how people are going to respond [to it] because the closest [film] that comes [to mind] is that movie The Breakfast Club."

Read more
5 years ago, this sci-fi Alien rip-off drowned at the box office. Is it worthy of reappraisal?
The aqua suits in the movie Underwater

Five years ago in January 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic started to make its first headlines, a different kind of disaster arrived in movie theaters: Underwater. The movie starred Kristen Stewart, and based on the trailers, it looked to pay homage to older sci-fi horror classics. Yet Underwater turned out to be a super clunky, visually murky, and ill-paced film about a deep-sea mining station at the bottom of the Mariana Trench that inadvertently wakes up a giant deep-sea monster.

In theory, Underwater should have been enjoyable. Even if it added nothing to the genre and was just a poor homage to Alien, Cloverfield, and The Abyss, it should have been at least derivative fun. But it wasn't, and audiences stayed away from the big-budget film. So what went wrong, and is Underwater worth watching five years later now that it's available to stream at home?
Why Underwater is a Cthulhu-sized disaster
Underwater | Official Trailer [HD] | 20th Century FOX

Read more