Skip to main content

Busted! Guy who used Twitter to manipulate stock market indicted

wall street
Image used with permission by copyright holder
This story’s too big for 140 characters: Fake Twitter accounts used to manipulate the U.S. stock market led to the indictment of a 62-year-old Scottish trader by the U.S. Attorney for Northern California.

The man, named as James Craig in the indictment, is accused of creating two bogus Twitter accounts under the guise of market research firms. He then used the fraudulent profiles to tweet misinformation about publicly traded stocks, allowing him to buy up shares when prices plummeted.

Recommended Videos

Craig’s alleged scam reportedly cost shareholders $1.8 million, although he himself is said to have been unsuccessful in profiting from the shares that he purchased.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Craig’s Twitter accounts impersonated market research firms Muddy Waters Research and Citron Research. According to a document filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, a typical tweet disseminated in 2013 from one of the fake accounts stated that Audience (a Bay area tech firm) was being investigated by the DOJ on fraud charges. This resulted in the company’s stock falling a whopping 28 percent.

On another occasion, Craig tweeted about Sarepta Therapeutics — a public biopharmaceutical company — claiming the Food and Drug Administration had seized the company’s drug trial papers due to certain trial results being tainted. This, states the SEC, caused the company’s share price to drop to a low of “16 percent below where it had traded just before the false tweets.”

To capitalize on the fall, Craig bought shares in both Audience and Sarepta — up to 400 in the former — before the SEC managed to halt trading. The SEC adds that Craig remained unsuccessful in his efforts to profit from the scam as he took too long to trade the stock, making as little as $100 in total. Oops.

In an ironic turn of events, Craig had previously tweeted that the SEC needed to arrest someone for the fraudulent tweets. Referring to Craig’s statements, the SEC’s San Francisco director Jina Choi noted: “Craig also said in later tweets that the SEC would have a hard time catching the perpetrator. As today’s enforcement action demonstrates, those tweets turned out to be false as well.” Double oops.

Craig currently faces both an SEC lawsuit and a DOJ indictment. However, a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney told Ars Technica that there is at present no public information regarding his whereabouts.

Saqib Shah
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Twitter may let you select who can reply to your tweets
twitter urges users to change password after finding bug 1

Twitter is considering a new feature that would let you control who can reply to your tweets.

The news came via a Twitter presentation at CES in Las Vegas on Wednesday, January 8.

Read more
A Twitter bug could use your phone number to expose personal information
twitter-app

Don’t upload your contacts to Twitter. If you do, or if you already have on your Android device, your phone number could be one of 17 million exposed on the app, a bug first reported by TechCrunch.

Security researcher Ibrahim Balic, who is based in London, told the site he was able to match records in seven different countries, including one of a senior Israeli politician and several other high-profile users. He did this when he discovered that when one uploads one’s contacts, the app would “fetch user data in return,” he told TechCrunch. It was then possible to match the phone numbers uploaded into the app with the Twitter records and figure out account usernames.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more