Skip to main content

Twitter ‘accidentally’ killed usernames in replies, and users weren’t happy

Twitter rolls out unpopular feature to Android despite earlier backlash

twitter safety search replies
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Back in December, Twitter “accidentally” made an experimental feature available to everyone on its iOS app, and the reaction from users was hostile — to say the least. That hasn’t stopped the firm from rolling out the feature to Android users, however.

The test involved the removal of usernames in tweet replies. As a result, when somebody responded to a tweet, an @ mention would not appear in their reply. It’s a change that has been in the works since May (when the platform announced a slew of changes to tweets) with Twitter selectively testing it with a handful of users from time to time. By mistakenly rolling it out widely, Twitter may have learned that it’s an update that, in practice, people simply don’t like — even if it helps save precious characters.

Recommended Videos

In general, it seems the change was met with confusion. Users complained that it looked jarring, and that it resulted in a loss of context when reading longer conversation threads.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

It didn’t take long for Twitter to take note of the feedback. The company’s official support account admitted its error on Thursday evening in the form of a tweet: “Today, an experiment around replies accidentally went out to everyone on iOS briefly. Upside, we got helpful feedback — we’re listening!”

Today, an experiment around replies accidentally went out to everyone on iOS briefly. Upside, we got helpful feedback – we’re listening!

— Support (@Support) December 9, 2016

But apparently, even if they were listening, they weren’t really persuaded to change course. In early January, it was reported that the same handle-less reply feature had begun rolling out to Twitter’s Android app. After all, the change was ultimately meant to make the platform easier to use, and earlier in 2015 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said that @ usernames only served to clutter tweets, and confounded new users.

The negative reception brings to mind the backlash that occurred when it was announced Twitter was introducing an optional algorithmic timeline. Twitter must have been aware of the response at the time, but the update was implemented nonetheless. It looks like history will repeat itself in regard to Twitter’s plan to kill @ usernames in replies — whether users like it or not.

Article originally published in December 2015. Updated on 1-4-2017 by Lulu Chang: Added news that the handle-less reply has rolled out to Android users. 

Saqib Shah
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Twitter’s quote tweet feature lands for users globally
Twitter symbol photo. Credits: Twitter official.

Twitter is rolling out a new feature to its entire community that lets you quickly see quote tweets for any tweet that appears in your timeline.

For those not in the know, a quote tweet is when someone retweets a tweet and adds a comment. It’s sometimes interesting or useful to see these quote tweets because, in Twitter’s own words, “tweets about a tweet add more to the conversation.”

Read more
Twitter iOS app update lets you choose who can reply to your tweets
Twitter logo.

Twitter just rolled out a new feature to its iOS app that lets users limit which people can reply to their tweets. 

The feature was announced in May as a test, but you can now use it in Twitter’s latest iOS app update, which rolled out late Wednesday. 

Read more
Twitter reveals details about massive Bitcoin hack
Jack Dorsey, co-founder and former CEO of Twitter

Twitter has revealed what it knows so far about the major hack involving a bitcoin scam that targeted dozens of high-profile accounts on its service on Wednesday, July 15.

In a series of tweets posted on its Support account, the company said it believed the hack had been made possible by tricking one or more of its employees who had access to Twitter’s internal systems and tools.

Read more