Skip to main content

Swift Observatory spots a black hole snacking on a nearby star

Black holes can be hungry beasts, devouring anything that comes to close to them, including clouds of gas, rogue planets, and even stars. When stars get too close to a black hole, they can be pulled apart by gravity in a process called tidal disruption that breaks up the star into streams of gas. But a recent discovery shows a different phenomenon: a black hole that is “snacking” on a star. It’s not totally destroying the star, but pulling off material and nibbling at it on a regular basis.

Black Hole Snack Attack

The process has been named partial or repeating tidal disruption, as instead of a star being ripped apart in one dramatic event, it is being slowly worn down by repeated encounters with a black hole. It was observed happening to a star called Swift J023017.0+283603 (or Swift J0230 for short) by NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory.

Swift J0230 occurred over 500 million light-years away in a galaxy named 2MASX J02301709+2836050, captured here by the Pan-STARRS telescope in Hawaii.
Swift J0230 occurred over 500 million light-years away in a galaxy named 2MASX J02301709+2836050, and is captured here by the Pan-STARRS telescope in Hawaii. Neils Bohr Institute/Daniele Malesani

Each time the unlucky star passes close to the black hole, the gravitational forces cause it to bulge outward and material is stripped away from it to be eaten by the black hole. But an individual encounter isn’t enough to destroy the star, so it carries on until its orbit brings it close to the black hole once again, when more material is stripped away.

Recommended Videos

In the case of Swift J0230, the sun loses around three Earth masses of material on each encounter, and will continue to lose mass until it runs out of material  and breaks apart.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

This event was observed because of a new method of data analysis being used on data from the Swift Observatory, which was launched nearly 20 years ago and was primarily designed to study gamma-ray bursts. Using data from the observatory’s X-ray Telescope instrument, the team turned the instrument into a kind of survey, as it regularly observes portions of the sky, and this data is compared to previous observations. That makes it clear when a change has occurred, indicating a transient event. This flags potentially interesting objects like Swift J0230 for the team to investigate.

“Swift’s hardware, software, and the skills of its international team have enabled it to adapt to new areas of astrophysics over its lifetime,” said Swift team member Phil Evans of the University of Leicester in a statement. “Neil Gehrels, the mission’s namesake, oversaw and encouraged many of those transitions. Now, with this new ability, it’s doing even more cool science.”

Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
What it takes to build a next-generation observatory
CSIRO's ASKAP antennas at the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory in Western Australia, 2010.

When you hear about big science projects like a huge new telescope or a miles-long particle accelerator, it’s usually in the context of the big science discoveries they’ve made. But before anyone can make a big science breakthrough, someone needs to design and build these massive facilities. And that can mean corralling international collaborations, running power lines, and facing extreme weather conditions just to get the concrete poured.

From rats chewing at fiber optic lines to inflatable tents to keep out the 100-degree heat, science can be messy when it meets the real world. We spoke to representatives from three current and upcoming big science projects to learn what it takes to turn a barren patch of rock and dirt into a world-class observatory.
Detecting something new
Many big facilities are incremental improvements on existing projects, but sometimes science takes a step forward in an entirely new direction. That’s what happened when it came to detecting gravitational waves for the first time, which the LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) facility achieved in 2015, and for which the researchers were awarded the Nobel Prize in physics.

Read more
Scientists want your help to search for black holes
An illustration of a black hole.

Even though black holes swallow anything that comes near them -- even light -- they are still possible to locate by looking for signs of their effects. Black holes are extremely dense, so they have a lot of mass and a strong gravitational effect that can be observed from light-years away. But the universe is a big place, and researchers are hoping that the public can help them to identify more black holes in the name of scientific exploration.

A project called Black Hole Hunter invites members of the public to search through data collected by NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) to look for signs of a black hole. Using a technique called gravitational microlensing, citizen scientists will look at how the brightness of light from various stars changes over time, looking for indications that a black hole could have passed in front of a star and bent the light coming from it. This should enable the project to identify black holes that would otherwise be invisible.

Read more
James Webb spots tiniest known brown dwarf in stunning star cluster
The central portion of the star cluster IC 348. Astronomers combed the cluster in search of tiny, free-floating brown dwarfs.

A new image from the James Webb Space Telescope shows a stunning view of a star cluster that contains some of the smallest brown dwarfs ever identified. A brown dwarf, also sometimes known as a failed star, is an object halfway between a star and a planet -- too big to be a planet but not large enough to sustain the nuclear fusion that defines a star.

It may sound surprising, but the definition of when something stops being a planet and starts being a star is, in fact, a little unclear. Brown dwarfs differ from planets in that they form like stars do, collapsing due to gravity, but they don't sustain fusion, and their size can be comparable to large planets. Researchers study brown dwarfs to learn about what makes the difference between these two classes of objects.

Read more