Skip to main content

Apple wanted smartwatch to focus more on health, but challenge proved too great

apple watch test lab fitness features wear next 120114 lifestyle 001
David Sims/Apple
Apple’s smartwatch is set to arrive in a couple of months, and all eyes will be on whether the device has managed to catch the gadget-buying public’s imagination to such a degree that they’ll happily hand over a wedge of notes for the flashy wrist-based computer.

Apple’s first ever smartwatch isn’t, however, quite what executives and engineers had in mind when they agreed on a design in the early stages of its development, according to a piece in Monday’s Wall Street Journal,

Recommended Videos

Insiders told the news outlet that originally the tech company was intent on creating a device that focused heavily on health and fitness, much more so than competing products currently on the market. Indeed, reports published months before the watch was unveiled in September suggested its designers were looking to include as many as 10 sensors geared toward collecting an array of health data.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

But as it tested features for measuring, for example, blood pressure, heart activity, and stress levels, they found the data collected by its on-board sensors to be too unreliable, while other desired features proved too complex to get right. Dry or hairy skin affected data accuracy, while the tightness of the watch’s strap was also an issue.

A ‘black hole’

The Journal claims the product’s development became so challenging that those working on it started calling it a “black hole” for all the resources that it sucked in.

The difficulties apparently forced Apple to ditch its original plan to create a gadget focused primarily on health. However, according to the Journal’s sources, the altered design left executives “struggling to define the purpose of the smartwatch and wrestling with why a consumer would need or want such a device.”

Taking its modified design into account, the watch is now likely to be marketed much more broadly. Apple CEO Tim Cook has already said as much, claiming just last week that consumers will be impressed by “the breadth of what it will do.”

It’s true, the Apple Watch will launch with several sensors – including a heart-rate monitor – and users can expect to see a slew of fitness apps landing on the platform over time, many of which will link to its Health app. However, the device’s design is thought to be far from the original plan and contains far fewer sensors than Apple envisioned when it launched the project.

Improvements

As the relevant technology advances, future iterations of the Apple Watch are bound to start incorporating more sensors to provide wearers with a wider variety of health and fitness data, although rivals will be planning on developing their own smartwatches along the same lines, possibly beating Apple to more advanced features in the process.

For the time being, Apple will be hoping the slick design of its smartwatch, as well as its broad functionality, will be enough to persuade consumers that its gadget is worth every cent of its $349+ price tag.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
As an Android user, here’s what I want to see from Apple’s ‘California Streaming’ event
Apple iPhone 11

With Apple's "California Streaming" event livestreaming tomorrow, we already have a good idea of everything that's going to be announced. From the iPhone 13 to the AirPods 3 to the Apple Watch Series 7,  there's something to appeal to every Apple user in the market for an upgrade. But I'm not an Apple user and I never really have been. So that brings up the age-old question: What would make me switch?

Guess no further, because here's my wish list:
A lot more juice for the iPhone 13

Read more
Fitbit Versa 3 vs. Apple Watch SE: Can Fitbit outrun Apple?
Fitbit Versa 3 on a wrist.

The Fitbit Versa 3 is arguably the best fitness-tracking smartwatch out today, particularly if you have less than $300 to spend. At only $230, it's highly comfortable and easy to use, while its tracking features are comprehensive for its price, covering heart rate and blood-oxygen sensors, the ability to monitor skin temperature, and built-in GPS. However, as good as it is, it isn't the only low-cost and high-functioning smartwatch. Another contender is the Apple Watch SE, which, despite being priced at around $300, does pretty much everything the more expensive Apple Watch Series 6 does, even throwing in a timer to ensure you wash your hands for at least 20 seconds.

Both devices have their strengths, but which is the best? We pit them against each other in a head-to-head comparison to find out. By looking at their specs, designs, displays, health and fitness tracking features, batteries, and special features, we also help you decide which is the right one for you.
Specs

Read more
Workouts for pregnancy and older adults added to Apple Fitness Plus
apple fitness plus adds workouts for pregnant women older adults

Most fitness apps are aimed at the younger demographic -- people in their 20s and 30s trying to get in shape. A few may have gentler workouts included for slightly older groups, but most are definitely skewed toward a younger audience.

Apple Fitness Plus changes that standard by introducing workouts designed specifically for pregnant women and older adults. These workouts are intended to be easier to start but customizable enough that participants can increase the intensity if they want. The new Workouts for Pregnancy consists of 10 workouts that target strength straining, core workouts, and mindful cooldown periods. The workouts are 10 minutes long and catered to every stage of pregnancy as well as every fitness level.

Read more