Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Wearables
  3. News

The privacy nightmare of smart glasses turns real as victim filmed and extorted

A smart glasses filming scandal shows how ugly wearable cameras can get

Add as a preferred source on Google
Meta Ray-Ban Gen 2 Smart Glasses
Meta Ray-Ban Gen 2 Smart Glasses Meta

Smart glasses have always had an obvious privacy concern, and a new BBC investigation just showed us why. A woman identified as Alice was approached by a man in a London shopping centre while he was wearing smart glasses. She thought it was a normal interaction and did not realize she was being recorded. The footage was later uploaded online and viewed around 40,000 times.

Where everything went wrong

Content creators or influencers recording unassuming pedestrians isn’t new—and is often harmless. But the story took a darker turn after Alice contacted the creator after she saw the video online. She explained to the person that it made her feel humiliated and asked for it to be removed. In an email response, the man allegedly called the removal a “paid service.” Alice described the experience as a breach of privacy and said it left her feeling exploited and powerless.

Recommended Videos

The man, who reportedly runs multiple accounts across TikTok and Instagram, did not reveal his identity and told BBC that his content was meant to show “light-hearted, respectful interactions”. He further added that the payment wording was a misunderstanding related to editing services. However, Alice said she had only asked for the video to be deleted.

Why privacy laws struggle here

The case highlights a difficult gap between wearable camera technology and privacy protections. Legal experts quoted in the report said the situation may not fit the standard definition of blackmail, but refusing to remove a video unless someone pays can still be considered a threat. The issue is quite unsettling because smart glasses do not look like a phone pointed at someone’s face, and many modern models can record from the wearer’s point of view, making public interactions easier to capture without the obvious warning.

Smart glasses aren’t inherently the problem. Though the ecosystem around them, with creators chasing engagement, platforms rewarding humiliation clips, and victims fighting for removal, is painting a bleak picture.

Vikhyaat Vivek
Vikhyaat Vivek is a tech journalist and reviewer with seven years of experience covering consumer hardware, with a focus on…
A smart glasses detector is now among the top paid apps on Apple’s App Store
Smart glasses have become so unsettling that people are buying proximity alerts
A Ray-Ban Meta Glasses wearer talks to another person using live translation.

An iPhone app designed to alert users when smart glasses may be nearby has climbed to No. 3 on the US paid App Store chart. Its name, AntiZuck Smart Glasses Scanner, leaves little doubt about how the developer feels about Meta’s camera-equipped glasses.

The app costs $2.99 and scans for Bluetooth signals linked to smart glasses. It can spot Meta Ray-Bans, Snap Spectacles, Amazon Echo Frames, and RayNeo glasses, then sends an alert when it believes one is nearby.

Read more
DuckDuckGo’s new smart glasses come with zero AI and 100% shade
No camera, no mic, no AI, just glass that blocks the sun the way sunglasses always have.
DuckDuckGo smart glasses

Smart glasses have quietly morphed into tiny surveillance cameras that people willingly wear on their faces. Every other week, a new pair promises to record video, listen to conversations, and feed it to an AI model somewhere in the cloud. They are causing such havoc that they have earned a new name: “pervert glasses.”

Not only are these glasses a privacy nightmare for people being recorded but also for people using them. A recent investigation by Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet showed that Meta Ray-Ban glasses were uploading intimate and private recordings for training its AI. 

Read more
Apple’s new Upgrade plan won’t punish missed payments with restrictions, but three strikes could end your lease
Restricted Mode remains in iOS 27 beta, but Apple says it won’t be used for Upgrade payment defaults
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple recently announced its new Apple Upgrade leasing plan, which lets customers pay monthly for an iPhone, iPad, Mac, or Apple Watch through Klarna. The program replaces the long-running iPhone Upgrade Program and expands the option beyond phones for the first time.

However, code discovered by 9to5Mac in an iOS 27 beta raised concerns about what could happen if someone fell behind on payments. The new App Managed Features system appeared capable of checking a customer’s payment status and placing a financed device into Restricted Mode.

Read more