Skip to main content

‘Cards Against Humanity’ raises $70,000 for Wikipedia

Cards Against Humanity, the adults-only party game that got its start thanks to a successful Kickstarter campaign at the beginning of 2011, has closed out 2012 with a $70,000 payment to the Wikimedia Foundation to ensure the continuation of Wikipedia as a free online resource.

The game,  described by its makers as “as despicable and awkward as you and your friends,” allows players to choose their preferred answer to a question chosen by “answer cards,” with the questions relatively benign and pop-culture savvy (“What’s my anti-drug?” or “What’s the most emo?” being two examples) and the answer options being … somewhat less polite (“Scrotal frostbite,” “Smegma” and “The profoundly handicapped” are some options from which to choose). Created by a group of friends at a New Year’s Eve party, the game’s Kickstarter campaign had raised $15,570 – almost four times the original target of $4000 – thus a legend, or at least a successful new party game, was born.

Recommended Videos

To celebrate this most wonderful time of the year, the game owners released a holiday expansion pack of questions and answers under a pay-what-you-want arrangement despite the potential risk from the cost involved ($225,762.63 in total, a cost which was broken down as $71,040.24 in manufacturing costs, $139,799.21 in shipping within the US and Canada alone, with the remainder split between other incidental costs). Thankfully, it was a risk that paid off; almost $300,000 was paid by those purchasing the packs, leaving the makers a profit of $70,066.27.

Within two days, the expansion packs had almost completely sold out, with people paying on average $3.89 per pack; the median price paid was $5, with 57.14 percent of those buying the packs paying that exact amount. About 20 percent paid absolutely nothing, and the highest price paid was just under $25. The expansion pack announcement raised web traffic for the site by more than 500 percent.

On the site, the Cards Against Humanity team suggested possible ways to spend $70,066.27 – including buying 5.8 million live crickets, or a condom for every man, woman and child in El Paso, TX – but ultimately, the money went to a more deserving home. “Instead of buying these things, we decided to donate the profits from our holiday packs to charity,” the team explained. “We’ve made a $70,066.27 contribution to the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia. Wikipedia is very important to us because without it we would not have known the exact volume of a dose of fresh boar sperm or graduated college.”

Max Temkin, one of the co-creators of the game, expanded on the reasoning to the Guardian newspaper. “From the outset we decided we wanted to give all the proceeds to charity and that made it more fun for us,” he said. “We wanted to pick something we thought the users of our game of had heard of and believed in and used and we felt like Wikipedia is pretty unique in terms of having universal appeal.” Consider it the ultimate in crowd-funded playing-it-forward.

Graeme McMillan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A transplant from the west coast of Scotland to the west coast of America, Graeme is a freelance writer with a taste for pop…
How to change margins in Google Docs
Laptop Working from Home

When you create a document in Google Docs, you may need to adjust the space between the edge of the page and the content --- the margins. For instance, many professors have requirements for the margin sizes you must use for college papers.

You can easily change the left, right, top, and bottom margins in Google Docs and have a few different ways to do it.

Read more
What is Microsoft Teams? How to use the collaboration app
A close-up of someone using Microsoft Teams on a laptop for a videoconference.

Online team collaboration is the new norm as companies spread their workforce across the globe. Gone are the days of primarily relying on group emails, as teams can now work together in real time using an instant chat-style interface, no matter where they are.

Using Microsoft Teams affords video conferencing, real-time discussions, document sharing and editing, and more for companies and corporations. It's one of many collaboration tools designed to bring company workers together in an online space. It’s not designed for communicating with family and friends, but for colleagues and clients.

Read more
Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs
A person using a laptop that displays various Microsoft Office apps.

For the last few decades, Microsoft Word has been the de facto standard for word processors across the working world. That's finally starting to shift, and it looks like one of Google's productivity apps is the heir apparent. The company's Google Docs solution (or to be specific, the integrated word processor) is cross-platform and interoperable, automatically syncs, is easily shareable, and perhaps best of all, is free.

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs.
How does each word processing program compare?
To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.

Read more