Companies will no longer be able to fine or sue you for negative online reviews

By Bruce Brown November 30, 2016

consumer review fairness act protects negative reviews 29198435 one star only low performance — convisum / 123RF Stock Photo

Here’s another reason terms of service agreements we all click but never read can suck. Some companies have included negative review gag clauses in their terms of service and then either levied fines or threatened legal action against people who posted poor reviews online. The U.S. Senate unanimously passed a bipartisan bill called the Consumer Review Fairness Act this week. The bill protects the consumer right to give negative reviews online and elsewhere, according to Ars Technica.

The bill was introduced in 2014 and had already been approved by the House of Representatives. It now only awaits President Barack Obama’s signature to become law. During a hearing of non-disparagement clauses in 2015, the Senate Commerce Committee heard from a consumer who was victimized by a gag clause. Ars Technica reported the committee heard “testimony from Jen Palmer, a plaintiff in Palmer v. KlearGear, where a company demanded the removal of a negative online review or payment of $3,500 in fines because the online merchant’s terms of service included a non-disparagement clause. When the review was not taken down, the company reported the unpaid $3,500 to a credit reporting agency as an outstanding debt, which negatively impacted the Palmers’ credit.”

Recommended Videos

In that case, Palmer won and Kleargear was ordered to pay $306,750, although it is not clear whether the money was ever paid to Palmer and her husband. Other cases heard by the Senate committee, according to Ars Technica, included supplement company Ubervita threatening Amazon customers leaving poor reviews with legal action and Boston-based Pageo Jewelers suing a Yelp reviewer for a one-star review.

Under the new bill, terms that disparage, restrict, or penalize poor customer reviews will be void. Any company that attempts to restrict customers or punish them for reviews will be subject to Federal Trade Commission enforcement of the law, with potential penalties.

The bipartisan support for the act was praised by both parties. “By ending gag clauses, this legislation supports consumer rights and the integrity of critical feedback about products and services sold online,” said Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.).

“Reviews on where to shop, eat, or stay on websites like Yelp or TripAdvisor help consumers make informed choices about where to spend their money,” said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). “Every consumer has the right to share their honest experiences and opinions of any business without the fear of legal retaliation, and the passage of our bill brings us one step closer to protecting that right.”

Topics

Contributing Editor

Bruce Brown Contributing Editor As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…

Computing

How to change margins in Google Docs

Laptop Working from Home

When you create a document in Google Docs, you may need to adjust the space between the edge of the page and the content --- the margins. For instance, many professors have requirements for the margin sizes you must use for college papers.

You can easily change the left, right, top, and bottom margins in Google Docs and have a few different ways to do it.

Computing

What is Microsoft Teams? How to use the collaboration app

A close-up of someone using Microsoft Teams on a laptop for a videoconference.

Online team collaboration is the new norm as companies spread their workforce across the globe. Gone are the days of primarily relying on group emails, as teams can now work together in real time using an instant chat-style interface, no matter where they are.

Using Microsoft Teams affords video conferencing, real-time discussions, document sharing and editing, and more for companies and corporations. It's one of many collaboration tools designed to bring company workers together in an online space. It’s not designed for communicating with family and friends, but for colleagues and clients.

Computing

Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs

A person using a laptop that displays various Microsoft Office apps.

For the last few decades, Microsoft Word has been the de facto standard for word processors across the working world. That's finally starting to shift, and it looks like one of Google's productivity apps is the heir apparent. The company's Google Docs solution (or to be specific, the integrated word processor) is cross-platform and interoperable, automatically syncs, is easily shareable, and perhaps best of all, is free.

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs.
How does each word processing program compare?
To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.