Skip to main content

U.S. government to ditch the domain-name business on October 1

ICANN domains
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The United States is satisfied that a private company is ready to take over the domain-name system that is the backbone of the Internet, and said in a statement earlier this week that it will allow the nonprofit to operate the system starting October 1.

Internet users will not notice any difference, as ICANN — the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers — was already doing the work behind the scenes. What it does mark is a key milestone in ICANN itself, which would then operate fully independent from the government. That wasn’t possible previously; with final control over domain names, the feds did have the option to intervene if they wanted to.

Recommended Videos

While that rarely happened, the most notable intervention was around the “.xxx” domain, which the U.S. (and several other countries, too) put pressure on ICANN to reject. The organization stood down and initially rejected the domain in 2006. However, it reversed that decision in 2011 and allowed .xxx to go live despite continued protest.

Several Republican lawmakers — most notably former presidential candidate Ted Cruz — criticized the deal, writing in a July letter that “the proposal will significantly increase the power of foreign governments over the internet.” The GOP even went as far as to codify it in the 2016 Republican platform.

But supporters of the move see it as the best solution. Both Russia and China lobbied hard to get the United Nations to step in and gain control of the system through its International Telecommunications Union arm. A treaty was in place in 2012 to do that, but the U.S., along with the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, refused to sign it over human rights concerns.

ICANN will remain in Los Angeles, so at least the organization running it will remain U.S.-based. Additionally, safeguards are in place to prevent a foreign takeover. “The community’s new powers to challenge board decisions and enforce decisions in court protect against any one party or group of interests from inappropriately influencing ICANN,” a Q&A on the change reads.

Ed Oswald
For fifteen years, Ed has written about the latest and greatest in gadgets and technology trends. At Digital Trends, he's…
U.S. to ban Kaspersky antivirus software over alleged Russian links
The keyboard and trackpad on the new Surface Laptop.

The Biden administration is banning the use of Kaspersky Lab cybersecurity software throughout the U.S. over fears that the Russian government may be interfering with its operations, the U.S. Commerce Department said on Thursday.

U.S. officials have long had concerns about the safety of Kaspersky’s software, claiming that Russian law gives Vladimir Putin’s government access to Kaspersky’s systems and therefore data on all of its customers.

Read more
T-Mobile is buying one of the largest carriers in the U.S.
Cell phone tower shooting off pink beams with a 5G logo next to it.

If you were impacted by T-Mobile's latest price hike and were looking for an alternative carrier, we have some bad news — T-Mobile is buying US Cellular. For those unaware, U.S. Cellular is the fifth-largest carrier in the U.S. despite being a regional carrier based mostly in the Chicago area. Unlike mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) like Metro by T-Mobile or Visible, which piggyback on a parent carrier’s network, US Cellular has its own towers and stores.

The deal would see T-Mobile pay $4.4 billion to take over US Cellular’s wireless customers, stores, and 30% of its spectrum assets. It includes a combination of cash and T-Mobile assuming $2 billion of U.S. Cellular’s debt. US Cellular will keep control of 4,400 of its towers and 70% of its spectrum portfolio, but T-Mobile will extend its leases for 600 US Cellular towers and sign new long-term leases on 2,015 more towers. In a conference call about the deal, T-Mobile also committed to hiring a significant number of U.S. Cellular associates.

Read more
Forget about the TikTok ban; now the U.S. might ban DJI
The DJI Mavic 3 Classic top view in flight

The specter of a U.S. market ban is once again looming over DJI, the biggest drone camera maker in the world. “DJI is on a Defense Department list of Chinese military companies whose products the U.S. armed forces will be prohibited from purchasing in the future,” reports The New York Times.

The defense budget for 2024 mentions a possible ban on importing DJI camera gear for federal agencies and government-funded programs. In 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department put DJI on a list of companies suspected of having ties to the Chinese military and alleged complicity in the surveillance of a minority group, culminating in investment and export restrictions.

Read more